Compare
Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is Σ min(weight) over the stocks both hold, from the latest disclosures. All 6,937 schemes are searchable — by scheme name, by fund house, or by the category you know them as.
4 of 6 chosen
Add another Mid Cap fund — overlap says most about funds of one kind:
Overlap
share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common
| each fundagainst each other | SBI MIDCAP | BANDHAN Small Cap | SBI SMALL CAP | Nippon India Growth Mid Cap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SBI MIDCAPMid Cap | itself | SBI MIDCAP and BANDHAN Small Cap share 2% of their portfolios | SBI MIDCAP and SBI SMALL CAP share 8% of their portfolios | SBI MIDCAP and Nippon India Growth Mid Cap share 26% of their portfolios |
| BANDHAN Small CapSmall Cap | BANDHAN Small Cap and SBI MIDCAP share 2% of their portfolios | itself | BANDHAN Small Cap and SBI SMALL CAP share 4% of their portfolios | BANDHAN Small Cap and Nippon India Growth Mid Cap share 10% of their portfolios |
| SBI SMALL CAPSmall Cap | SBI SMALL CAP and SBI MIDCAP share 8% of their portfolios | SBI SMALL CAP and BANDHAN Small Cap share 4% of their portfolios | itself | SBI SMALL CAP and Nippon India Growth Mid Cap share 4% of their portfolios |
| Nippon India Growth Mid CapMid Cap | Nippon India Growth Mid Cap and SBI MIDCAP share 26% of their portfolios | Nippon India Growth Mid Cap and BANDHAN Small Cap share 10% of their portfolios | Nippon India Growth Mid Cap and SBI SMALL CAP share 4% of their portfolios | itself |
Closest pair: SBI MIDCAP FUND and Nippon India Growth Mid Cap Fund share 26% of their portfolios. Most of what each of them holds, the other does not; whether two funds this far apart belong in one portfolio is a separate question.
Read a cell as: of everything the two funds hold, this much is the same holding at the same weight. It is symmetric — the pair above the diagonal and the pair below it are one number shown twice. A pair at 0% holds nothing in common, which is a real answer, and often the useful one.
Side by side
record, cost, returns, drawdown, size
| Measure | SBI MIDCAP | BANDHAN Small Cap | SBI SMALL CAP | Nippon India Growth Mid Cap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Category | Mid Cap | Small Cap | Small Cap | Mid Cap |
| Fund house | SBI Funds Management Limited | Bandhan AMC Limited | SBI Funds Management Limited | Nippon Life India Asset Management Limited |
| Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P4 | 38% of 109 | 75% of 44 | 49% of 109 | 87% of 109 |
| Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P5 | 1.09% points | 2.00% points | 1.31% points | 0.86% points |
| Portfolio turned over a year P1 | 80% | 68% | 54% | 52% |
| Run by P7 | Bhavin Vithlani · ≥ 3 mo | Kirthi Jain · ≥ 2.8 yrs | R Srinivasan · ≥ 3 mo | Rupesh Patel · 3.6 yrs |
| 1-year return | 3.8% | 10.4% | 6.6% | 7.0% |
| 3 years p.a. | 11.0% | 25.3% | 12.3% | 18.6% |
| 5 years p.a. | 13.5% | 20.0% | 14.2% | 18.0% |
| Deepest fall (max drawdown) | −17.9% | −22.8% | −22.4% | −19.9% |
| Assets (AUM) | ₹24,349 Cr | ₹31,103 Cr | ₹39,942 Cr | ₹48,143 Cr |
| Disclosed history | 5.8 yrs | 4.3 yrs | 5.8 yrs | 14 yrs |
| Holdings · top ten weight | 64 · 28% | 265 · 30% | 73 · 37% | 105 · 25% |
Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — a category error is the first thing the postulates refuse to make. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.