ANVESHAN Create account

Compare

Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is Σ min(weight) over the stocks both hold, from the latest disclosures. All 6,937 schemes are searchable — by scheme name, by fund house, or by the category you know them as.

4 of 6 chosen

  • SBI MIDCAP FUNDMid Cap×
  • Nippon India Large Cap FundLarge Cap×
  • Motilal Oswal Midcap FundMid Cap×
  • Kotak Mid Cap FundMid Cap · no portfolio disclosed×

Overlap

share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common

each fundagainst each otherSBI MIDCAPNippon India Large CapMotilal Oswal MidcapKotak Mid Cap
SBI MIDCAPMid Cap
itself
SBI MIDCAP and Nippon India Large Cap share 4% of their portfolios
SBI MIDCAP and Motilal Oswal Midcap share 5% of their portfolios
SBI MIDCAP and Kotak Mid Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Mid Cap
Nippon India Large CapLarge Cap
Nippon India Large Cap and SBI MIDCAP share 4% of their portfolios
itself
Nippon India Large Cap and Motilal Oswal Midcap share 6% of their portfolios
Nippon India Large Cap and Kotak Mid Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Mid Cap
Motilal Oswal MidcapMid Cap
Motilal Oswal Midcap and SBI MIDCAP share 5% of their portfolios
Motilal Oswal Midcap and Nippon India Large Cap share 6% of their portfolios
itself
Motilal Oswal Midcap and Kotak Mid Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Mid Cap
Kotak Mid CapMid Cap
Kotak Mid Cap and SBI MIDCAP: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Mid Cap
Kotak Mid Cap and Nippon India Large Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Mid Cap
Kotak Mid Cap and Motilal Oswal Midcap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Mid Cap
itself

No two of these hold much of the same portfolio. The closest pair, Nippon India Large Cap Fund and Motilal Oswal Midcap Fund, share 6%. That is a number, not a resemblance: at this level the two funds are doing separate things, and nothing here says whether that is what you wanted.

Kotak Mid Cap has no portfolio on file, so its row is blank rather than zero — that is an absence in our data, not a finding about the fund.

Read a cell as: of everything the two funds hold, this much is the same holding at the same weight. It is symmetric — the pair above the diagonal and the pair below it are one number shown twice. A pair at 0% holds nothing in common, which is a real answer, and often the useful one.

Side by side

record, cost, returns, drawdown, size

MeasureSBI MIDCAPNippon India Large CapMotilal Oswal MidcapKotak Mid Cap
CategoryMid CapLarge CapMid CapMid Cap
Fund houseSBI Funds Management LimitedNippon Life India Asset Management LimitedMotilal Oswal Asset Management Company LimitedKotak Mahindra Asset Management Company Limited.
Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P438% of 10973% of 10954% of 10983% of 109
Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P51.09% points1.01% points1.37% points1.44% points
Portfolio turned over a year P180%57%92%not measured
Run by P7Bhavin Vithlani · ≥ 3 moSailesh Raj Bhan · 19 yrsRakesh Shetty · 3.8 yrsnot known
1-year return3.8%−4.7%−0.5%4.8%
3 years p.a.11.0%11.1%19.5%18.1%
5 years p.a.13.5%12.8%21.1%16.8%
Deepest fall (max drawdown)−17.9%−15.4%−28.9%−20.9%
Assets (AUM)₹24,349 Cr₹52,344 Cr₹41,706 Cr₹64,136 Cr
Disclosed history5.8 yrs13 yrs4.0 yrs—
Holdings · top ten weight64 · 28%69 · 45%32 · 54%none disclosed

Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — a category error is the first thing the postulates refuse to make. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.