ANVESHAN Create account

Compare

Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is Σ min(weight) over the stocks both hold, from the latest disclosures. All 6,937 schemes are searchable — by scheme name, by fund house, or by the category you know them as.

4 of 6 chosen

  • SBI MIDCAP FUNDMid Cap×
  • Nippon India Growth Mid Cap FundMid Cap×
  • Mirae Asset Midcap FundMid Cap×
  • Kotak Mid Cap FundMid Cap · no portfolio disclosed×

Overlap

share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common

each fundagainst each otherSBI MIDCAPNippon India Growth Mid CapMirae Asset MidcapKotak Mid Cap
SBI MIDCAPMid Cap
itself
SBI MIDCAP and Nippon India Growth Mid Cap share 26% of their portfolios
SBI MIDCAP and Mirae Asset Midcap share 22% of their portfolios
SBI MIDCAP and Kotak Mid Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Mid Cap
Nippon India Growth Mid CapMid Cap
Nippon India Growth Mid Cap and SBI MIDCAP share 26% of their portfolios
itself
Nippon India Growth Mid Cap and Mirae Asset Midcap share 31% of their portfolios
Nippon India Growth Mid Cap and Kotak Mid Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Mid Cap
Mirae Asset MidcapMid Cap
Mirae Asset Midcap and SBI MIDCAP share 22% of their portfolios
Mirae Asset Midcap and Nippon India Growth Mid Cap share 31% of their portfolios
itself
Mirae Asset Midcap and Kotak Mid Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Mid Cap
Kotak Mid CapMid Cap
Kotak Mid Cap and SBI MIDCAP: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Mid Cap
Kotak Mid Cap and Nippon India Growth Mid Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Mid Cap
Kotak Mid Cap and Mirae Asset Midcap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Mid Cap
itself

Closest pair: Nippon India Growth Mid Cap Fund and Mirae Asset Midcap Fund share 31% of their portfolios. Most of what each of them holds, the other does not; whether two funds this far apart belong in one portfolio is a separate question.

Kotak Mid Cap has no portfolio on file, so its row is blank rather than zero — that is an absence in our data, not a finding about the fund.

Read a cell as: of everything the two funds hold, this much is the same holding at the same weight. It is symmetric — the pair above the diagonal and the pair below it are one number shown twice. A pair at 0% holds nothing in common, which is a real answer, and often the useful one.

Side by side

record, cost, returns, drawdown, size

MeasureSBI MIDCAPNippon India Growth Mid CapMirae Asset MidcapKotak Mid Cap
CategoryMid CapMid CapMid CapMid Cap
Fund houseSBI Funds Management LimitedNippon Life India Asset Management LimitedMirae Asset Investment Managers (India) Pvt. LtdKotak Mahindra Asset Management Company Limited.
Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P438% of 10987% of 10941% of 5183% of 109
Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P51.09% points0.86% points1.55% points1.44% points
Portfolio turned over a year P180%52%89%not measured
Run by P7Bhavin Vithlani · ≥ 3 moRupesh Patel · 3.6 yrsAnkit Jain · 7.2 yrsnot known
1-year return3.8%7.0%9.1%4.8%
3 years p.a.11.0%18.6%16.4%18.1%
5 years p.a.13.5%18.0%15.8%16.8%
Deepest fall (max drawdown)−17.9%−19.9%−22.5%−20.9%
Assets (AUM)₹24,349 Cr₹48,143 Cr₹20,000 Cr₹64,136 Cr
Disclosed history5.8 yrs14 yrs5.1 yrs—
Holdings · top ten weight64 · 28%105 · 25%68 · 32%none disclosed

Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — a category error is the first thing the postulates refuse to make. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.