ANVESHAN Create account

Compare

Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is Σ min(weight) over the stocks both hold, from the latest disclosures. All 6,937 schemes are searchable — by scheme name, by fund house, or by the category you know them as.

4 of 6 chosen

  • Nippon India Dynamic Term FundDynamic Term×
  • SBI DYNAMIC TERM FUNDDynamic Term×
  • Axis Dynamic Term FundDynamic Term×
  • ICICI Prudential Dynamic Term FundDynamic Term×

Overlap

share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common

each fundagainst each otherNippon India Dynamic TermSBI DYNAMIC TERMAxis Dynamic TermICICI Prudential Dynamic Term
Nippon India Dynamic TermDynamic Term
itself
Nippon India Dynamic Term and SBI DYNAMIC TERM share 0% of their portfolios
Nippon India Dynamic Term and Axis Dynamic Term share 1% of their portfolios
Nippon India Dynamic Term and ICICI Prudential Dynamic Term share 0% of their portfolios
SBI DYNAMIC TERMDynamic Term
SBI DYNAMIC TERM and Nippon India Dynamic Term share 0% of their portfolios
itself
SBI DYNAMIC TERM and Axis Dynamic Term share 3% of their portfolios
SBI DYNAMIC TERM and ICICI Prudential Dynamic Term share 3% of their portfolios
Axis Dynamic TermDynamic Term
Axis Dynamic Term and Nippon India Dynamic Term share 1% of their portfolios
Axis Dynamic Term and SBI DYNAMIC TERM share 3% of their portfolios
itself
Axis Dynamic Term and ICICI Prudential Dynamic Term share 6% of their portfolios
ICICI Prudential Dynamic TermDynamic Term
ICICI Prudential Dynamic Term and Nippon India Dynamic Term share 0% of their portfolios
ICICI Prudential Dynamic Term and SBI DYNAMIC TERM share 3% of their portfolios
ICICI Prudential Dynamic Term and Axis Dynamic Term share 6% of their portfolios
itself

No two of these hold much of the same portfolio. The closest pair, Axis Dynamic Term Fund and ICICI Prudential Dynamic Term Fund, share 6%. That is a number, not a resemblance: at this level the two funds are doing separate things, and nothing here says whether that is what you wanted.

Read a cell as: of everything the two funds hold, this much is the same holding at the same weight. It is symmetric — the pair above the diagonal and the pair below it are one number shown twice. A pair at 0% holds nothing in common, which is a real answer, and often the useful one.

Side by side

record, cost, returns, drawdown, size

MeasureNippon India Dynamic TermSBI DYNAMIC TERMAxis Dynamic TermICICI Prudential Dynamic Term
CategoryDynamic TermDynamic TermDynamic TermDynamic Term
Fund houseNippon Life India Asset Management LimitedSBI Funds Management LimitedAxis Asset Management Co. Ltd.ICICI Prudential Asset Management Company Limited
Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P419% of 10995% of 10977% of 109100% of 109
Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P50.57% points0.79% points0.67% points0.54% points
Portfolio turned over a year P1not measurednot measured1%not measured
Run by P7Vivek Sharma · 6.2 yrsSudhir Agarwal · ≥ 3 monot knownManish Banthia · 14 yrs
1-year return5.2%5.5%6.4%5.6%
3 years p.a.7.2%7.4%7.4%7.7%
5 years p.a.6.2%6.8%6.2%7.0%
Deepest fall (max drawdown)−1.5%−1.6%−1.3%−1.5%
Assets (AUM)₹3,911 Cr₹3,678 Cr₹1,040 Cr₹13,261 Cr
Disclosed history14 yrs5.8 yrs5.9 yrs13 yrs
Holdings · top ten weight100 · 40%19 · 82%58 · 61%98 · 39%

Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — a category error is the first thing the postulates refuse to make. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.