Compare
Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is Σ min(weight) over the stocks both hold, from the latest disclosures.
Overlap
share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common
| Nippon India Floating Interest Rates | Kotak Floating Interest Rates | |
|---|---|---|
| Nippon India Floating Interest Rates | itself | 0% |
| Kotak Floating Interest Rates | 0% | itself |
Most alike: Nippon India Floating Interest Rates Fund and Kotak Floating Interest Rates Fund share 0% of their portfolios. Two funds this different are doing different things; whether that is what you want is a separate question.
Side by side
record, cost, returns, drawdown, size
| Measure | Nippon India Floating Interest Rates | Kotak Floating Interest Rates |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Floating Interest Rates | Floating Interest Rates |
| Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P4 | 50% of 109 | 74% of 53 |
| Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P5 | 0.40% | 0.41% |
| Portfolio turned over a year P1 | not measured | not measured |
| Run by P7 | Vikash Agarwal · 1.9 yrs | not known |
| 1-year return | 5.6% | 6.0% |
| 3 years p.a. | 7.4% | 7.7% |
| 5 years p.a. | 6.6% | 6.7% |
| Deepest fall (max drawdown) | −0.5% | −0.5% |
| Assets (AUM) | ₹7,577 Cr | ₹3,277 Cr |
| Disclosed history | 13 yrs | — |
| Holdings · top ten weight | 122 · 27% | — · — |
Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — a category error is the first thing the postulates refuse to make. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.