Compare
Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is Σ min(weight) over the stocks both hold, from the latest disclosures. All 6,937 schemes are searchable — by scheme name, by fund house, or by the category you know them as.
5 of 6 chosen
Add another Value fund — overlap says most about funds of one kind:
Overlap
share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common
| each fundagainst each other | ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) | ICICI Prudential Flexi Cap | SBI FLEXICAP | Kotak Multi Cap | Bandhan Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund)Value | itself | ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) and ICICI Prudential Flexi Cap share 29% of their portfolios | ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) and SBI FLEXICAP share 28% of their portfolios | ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) and Kotak Multi Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Multi Cap | ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) and Bandhan Value share 52% of their portfolios |
| ICICI Prudential Flexi CapFlexi Cap | ICICI Prudential Flexi Cap and ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) share 29% of their portfolios | itself | ICICI Prudential Flexi Cap and SBI FLEXICAP share 24% of their portfolios | ICICI Prudential Flexi Cap and Kotak Multi Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Multi Cap | ICICI Prudential Flexi Cap and Bandhan Value share 21% of their portfolios |
| SBI FLEXICAPFlexi Cap | SBI FLEXICAP and ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) share 28% of their portfolios | SBI FLEXICAP and ICICI Prudential Flexi Cap share 24% of their portfolios | itself | SBI FLEXICAP and Kotak Multi Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Multi Cap | SBI FLEXICAP and Bandhan Value share 22% of their portfolios |
| Kotak Multi CapMulti Cap | Kotak Multi Cap and ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund): no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Multi Cap | Kotak Multi Cap and ICICI Prudential Flexi Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Multi Cap | Kotak Multi Cap and SBI FLEXICAP: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Multi Cap | itself | Kotak Multi Cap and Bandhan Value: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Multi Cap |
| Bandhan ValueValue | Bandhan Value and ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) share 52% of their portfolios | Bandhan Value and ICICI Prudential Flexi Cap share 21% of their portfolios | Bandhan Value and SBI FLEXICAP share 22% of their portfolios | Bandhan Value and Kotak Multi Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Multi Cap | itself |
Closest pair: ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) and Bandhan Value Fund share 52% of their portfolios. Holding both is closer to holding one twice than to diversifying.
Kotak Multi Cap has no portfolio on file, so its row is blank rather than zero — that is an absence in our data, not a finding about the fund.
Read a cell as: of everything the two funds hold, this much is the same holding at the same weight. It is symmetric — the pair above the diagonal and the pair below it are one number shown twice. A pair at 0% holds nothing in common, which is a real answer, and often the useful one.
Side by side
record, cost, returns, drawdown, size
| Measure | ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) | ICICI Prudential Flexi Cap | SBI FLEXICAP | Kotak Multi Cap | Bandhan Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Category | Value | Flexi Cap | Flexi Cap | Multi Cap | Value |
| Fund house | ICICI Prudential Asset Management Company Limited | ICICI Prudential Asset Management Company Limited | SBI Funds Management Limited | Kotak Mahindra Asset Management Company Limited. | Bandhan AMC Limited |
| Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P4 | 68% of 109 | 96% of 27 | 58% of 109 | 100% of 24 | 67% of 109 |
| Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P5 | 0.83% points | 1.28% points | 1.03% points | 1.62% points | 1.17% points |
| Portfolio turned over a year P1 | 58% | 52% | 129% | not measured | 68% |
| Run by P7 | Dharmesh Kakkad · 5.7 yrs | Rajat Chandak · 5.2 yrs | Anup Upadhyay · ≥ 3 mo | not known | Daylynn Pinto · ≥ 3.5 yrs |
| 1-year return | −5.4% | 3.8% | −2.1% | 4.2% | −1.1% |
| 3 years p.a. | 11.5% | 16.2% | 8.6% | 17.3% | 10.4% |
| 5 years p.a. | 13.5% | 15.0% | 8.2% | — | 12.8% |
| Deepest fall (max drawdown) | −14.0% | −19.7% | −16.0% | −21.0% | −17.9% |
| Assets (AUM) | ₹60,800 Cr | ₹25,256 Cr | ₹22,888 Cr | ₹25,937 Cr | ₹10,051 Cr |
| Disclosed history | 13 yrs | 5.2 yrs | 5.8 yrs | — | 4.9 yrs |
| Holdings · top ten weight | 66 · 52% | 80 · 45% | 71 · 36% | none disclosed | 68 · 47% |
Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — a category error is the first thing the postulates refuse to make. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.