ANVESHAN Create account

Compare

Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is Σ min(weight) over the stocks both hold, from the latest disclosures. All 6,937 schemes are searchable — by scheme name, by fund house, or by the category you know them as.

4 of 6 chosen

  • ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund)Value×
  • HDFC Small Cap FundSmall Cap×
  • Nippon India Large Cap FundLarge Cap×
  • Bandhan Value FundValue×

Overlap

share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common

each fundagainst each otherICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund)HDFC Small CapNippon India Large CapBandhan Value
ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund)Value
itself
ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) and HDFC Small Cap share 2% of their portfolios
ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) and Nippon India Large Cap share 52% of their portfolios
ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) and Bandhan Value share 52% of their portfolios
HDFC Small CapSmall Cap
HDFC Small Cap and ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) share 2% of their portfolios
itself
HDFC Small Cap and Nippon India Large Cap share 3% of their portfolios
HDFC Small Cap and Bandhan Value share 1% of their portfolios
Nippon India Large CapLarge Cap
Nippon India Large Cap and ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) share 52% of their portfolios
Nippon India Large Cap and HDFC Small Cap share 3% of their portfolios
itself
Nippon India Large Cap and Bandhan Value share 44% of their portfolios
Bandhan ValueValue
Bandhan Value and ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) share 52% of their portfolios
Bandhan Value and HDFC Small Cap share 1% of their portfolios
Bandhan Value and Nippon India Large Cap share 44% of their portfolios
itself

Closest pair: ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) and Bandhan Value Fund share 52% of their portfolios. Holding both is closer to holding one twice than to diversifying.

Read a cell as: of everything the two funds hold, this much is the same holding at the same weight. It is symmetric — the pair above the diagonal and the pair below it are one number shown twice. A pair at 0% holds nothing in common, which is a real answer, and often the useful one.

Side by side

record, cost, returns, drawdown, size

MeasureICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund)HDFC Small CapNippon India Large CapBandhan Value
CategoryValueSmall CapLarge CapValue
Fund houseICICI Prudential Asset Management Company LimitedHDFC Asset Management Company LimitedNippon Life India Asset Management LimitedBandhan AMC Limited
Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P468% of 10963% of 10973% of 10967% of 109
Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P50.83% points1.25% points1.01% points1.17% points
Portfolio turned over a year P158%46%57%68%
Run by P7Dharmesh Kakkad · 5.7 yrsnot knownSailesh Raj Bhan · 19 yrsDaylynn Pinto · ≥ 3.5 yrs
1-year return−5.4%−2.6%−4.7%−1.1%
3 years p.a.11.5%11.3%11.1%10.4%
5 years p.a.13.5%14.8%12.8%12.8%
Deepest fall (max drawdown)−14.0%−22.6%−15.4%−17.9%
Assets (AUM)₹60,800 Cr₹42,162 Cr₹52,344 Cr₹10,051 Cr
Disclosed history13 yrs2.4 yrs13 yrs4.9 yrs
Holdings · top ten weight66 · 52%87 · 35%69 · 45%68 · 47%

Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — a category error is the first thing the postulates refuse to make. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.