ANVESHAN Create account

Compare

Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is Σ min(weight) over the stocks both hold, from the latest disclosures. All 6,937 schemes are searchable — by scheme name, by fund house, or by the category you know them as.

4 of 6 chosen

  • ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund)Value×
  • Motilal Oswal Midcap FundMid Cap×
  • SBI MIDCAP FUNDMid Cap×
  • UTI Value FundValue×

Overlap

share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common

each fundagainst each otherICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund)Motilal Oswal MidcapSBI MIDCAPUTI Value
ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund)Value
itself
ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) and Motilal Oswal Midcap share 0% of their portfolios
ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) and SBI MIDCAP share 3% of their portfolios
ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) and UTI Value share 42% of their portfolios
Motilal Oswal MidcapMid Cap
Motilal Oswal Midcap and ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) share 0% of their portfolios
itself
Motilal Oswal Midcap and SBI MIDCAP share 5% of their portfolios
Motilal Oswal Midcap and UTI Value share 4% of their portfolios
SBI MIDCAPMid Cap
SBI MIDCAP and ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) share 3% of their portfolios
SBI MIDCAP and Motilal Oswal Midcap share 5% of their portfolios
itself
SBI MIDCAP and UTI Value share 9% of their portfolios
UTI ValueValue
UTI Value and ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) share 42% of their portfolios
UTI Value and Motilal Oswal Midcap share 4% of their portfolios
UTI Value and SBI MIDCAP share 9% of their portfolios
itself

Closest pair: ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) and UTI Value Fund share 42% of their portfolios. Most of what each of them holds, the other does not; whether two funds this far apart belong in one portfolio is a separate question.

Read a cell as: of everything the two funds hold, this much is the same holding at the same weight. It is symmetric — the pair above the diagonal and the pair below it are one number shown twice. A pair at 0% holds nothing in common, which is a real answer, and often the useful one.

Side by side

record, cost, returns, drawdown, size

MeasureICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund)Motilal Oswal MidcapSBI MIDCAPUTI Value
CategoryValueMid CapMid CapValue
Fund houseICICI Prudential Asset Management Company LimitedMotilal Oswal Asset Management Company LimitedSBI Funds Management LimitedUTI Asset Mgmt. Co. Ltd.
Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P468% of 10954% of 10938% of 10937% of 109
Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P50.83% points1.37% points1.09% points0.79% points
Portfolio turned over a year P158%92%80%47%
Run by P7Dharmesh Kakkad · 5.7 yrsRakesh Shetty · 3.8 yrsBhavin Vithlani · ≥ 3 moAmit Premchandani · 8.6 yrs
1-year return−5.4%−0.5%3.8%−4.1%
3 years p.a.11.5%19.5%11.0%12.1%
5 years p.a.13.5%21.1%13.5%11.0%
Deepest fall (max drawdown)−14.0%−28.9%−17.9%−17.2%
Assets (AUM)₹60,800 Cr₹41,706 Cr₹24,349 Cr₹9,603 Cr
Disclosed history13 yrs4.0 yrs5.8 yrs12 yrs
Holdings · top ten weight66 · 52%32 · 54%64 · 28%71 · 41%

Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — a category error is the first thing the postulates refuse to make. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.