ANVESHAN Create account

Compare

Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is Σ min(weight) over the stocks both hold, from the latest disclosures. All 6,937 schemes are searchable — by scheme name, by fund house, or by the category you know them as.

3 of 6 chosen

  • ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund)Value×
  • ICICI Prudential Large Cap Fund (erstwhile Bluechip Fund)Large Cap×
  • Kotak Multi Cap FundMulti Cap · no portfolio disclosed×

Overlap

share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common

each fundagainst each otherICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund)ICICI Prudential Large Cap Fund (erstwhile Bluechip Fund)Kotak Multi Cap
ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund)Value
itself
ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) and ICICI Prudential Large Cap Fund (erstwhile Bluechip Fund) share 60% of their portfolios
ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) and Kotak Multi Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Multi Cap
ICICI Prudential Large Cap Fund (erstwhile Bluechip Fund)Large Cap
ICICI Prudential Large Cap Fund (erstwhile Bluechip Fund) and ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) share 60% of their portfolios
itself
ICICI Prudential Large Cap Fund (erstwhile Bluechip Fund) and Kotak Multi Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Multi Cap
Kotak Multi CapMulti Cap
Kotak Multi Cap and ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund): no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Multi Cap
Kotak Multi Cap and ICICI Prudential Large Cap Fund (erstwhile Bluechip Fund): no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Multi Cap
itself

Closest pair: ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) and ICICI Prudential Large Cap Fund (erstwhile Bluechip Fund) share 60% of their portfolios. Holding both is closer to holding one twice than to diversifying.

Kotak Multi Cap has no portfolio on file, so its row is blank rather than zero — that is an absence in our data, not a finding about the fund.

Read a cell as: of everything the two funds hold, this much is the same holding at the same weight. It is symmetric — the pair above the diagonal and the pair below it are one number shown twice. A pair at 0% holds nothing in common, which is a real answer, and often the useful one.

Side by side

record, cost, returns, drawdown, size

MeasureICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund)ICICI Prudential Large Cap Fund (erstwhile Bluechip Fund)Kotak Multi Cap
CategoryValueLarge CapMulti Cap
Fund houseICICI Prudential Asset Management Company LimitedICICI Prudential Asset Management Company LimitedKotak Mahindra Asset Management Company Limited.
Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P468% of 10990% of 109100% of 24
Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P50.83% points0.81% points1.62% points
Portfolio turned over a year P158%45%not measured
Run by P7Dharmesh Kakkad · 5.7 yrsVaibhav Dusad · 5.7 yrsnot known
1-year return−5.4%−5.3%4.2%
3 years p.a.11.5%10.6%17.3%
5 years p.a.13.5%10.9%—
Deepest fall (max drawdown)−14.0%−15.4%−21.0%
Assets (AUM)₹60,800 Cr₹80,822 Cr₹25,937 Cr
Disclosed history13 yrs13 yrs—
Holdings · top ten weight66 · 52%93 · 47%none disclosed

Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — a category error is the first thing the postulates refuse to make. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.