ANVESHAN Create account

Compare

Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is Σ min(weight) over the stocks both hold, from the latest disclosures. All 6,937 schemes are searchable — by scheme name, by fund house, or by the category you know them as.

4 of 6 chosen

  • ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund)Value×
  • Quant Small Cap FundSmall Cap×
  • BANDHAN Small Cap FundSmall Cap×
  • HSBC Small Cap FundSmall Cap×

Overlap

share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common

each fundagainst each otherICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund)Quant Small CapBANDHAN Small CapHSBC Small Cap
ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund)Value
itself
ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) and Quant Small Cap share 3% of their portfolios
ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) and BANDHAN Small Cap share 7% of their portfolios
ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) and HSBC Small Cap share 0% of their portfolios
Quant Small CapSmall Cap
Quant Small Cap and ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) share 3% of their portfolios
itself
Quant Small Cap and BANDHAN Small Cap share 9% of their portfolios
Quant Small Cap and HSBC Small Cap share 7% of their portfolios
BANDHAN Small CapSmall Cap
BANDHAN Small Cap and ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) share 7% of their portfolios
BANDHAN Small Cap and Quant Small Cap share 9% of their portfolios
itself
BANDHAN Small Cap and HSBC Small Cap share 9% of their portfolios
HSBC Small CapSmall Cap
HSBC Small Cap and ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) share 0% of their portfolios
HSBC Small Cap and Quant Small Cap share 7% of their portfolios
HSBC Small Cap and BANDHAN Small Cap share 9% of their portfolios
itself

No two of these hold much of the same portfolio. The closest pair, BANDHAN Small Cap Fund and HSBC Small Cap Fund, share 9%. That is a number, not a resemblance: at this level the two funds are doing separate things, and nothing here says whether that is what you wanted.

Read a cell as: of everything the two funds hold, this much is the same holding at the same weight. It is symmetric — the pair above the diagonal and the pair below it are one number shown twice. A pair at 0% holds nothing in common, which is a real answer, and often the useful one.

Side by side

record, cost, returns, drawdown, size

MeasureICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund)Quant Small CapBANDHAN Small CapHSBC Small Cap
CategoryValueSmall CapSmall CapSmall Cap
Fund houseICICI Prudential Asset Management Company Limitedquant Money Managers LimitedBandhan AMC LimitedHSBC Asset Management (India) Private Ltd.
Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P468% of 10969% of 10975% of 440% of 11
Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P50.83% points0.84% points2.00% points1.21% points
Portfolio turned over a year P158%75%68%83%
Run by P7Dharmesh Kakkad · 5.7 yrsAnkit Pande · ≥ 2.5 yrsKirthi Jain · ≥ 2.8 yrsVenugopal Manghat · 6.7 yrs
1-year return−5.4%12.7%10.4%12.5%
3 years p.a.11.5%18.5%25.3%15.6%
5 years p.a.13.5%19.2%20.0%—
Deepest fall (max drawdown)−14.0%−24.4%−22.8%−27.2%
Assets (AUM)₹60,800 Cr₹34,069 Cr₹31,103 Cr₹19,076 Cr
Disclosed history13 yrs7.5 yrs4.3 yrs3.8 yrs
Holdings · top ten weight66 · 52%120 · 43%265 · 30%115 · 20%

Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — a category error is the first thing the postulates refuse to make. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.