Compare
Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is Σ min(weight) over the stocks both hold, from the latest disclosures.
Overlap
share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common
| UTI Conservative Hybrid | Parag Parikh Conservative Hybrid | |
|---|---|---|
| UTI Conservative Hybrid | itself | 6% |
| Parag Parikh Conservative Hybrid | 6% | itself |
Most alike: UTI Conservative Hybrid Fund and Parag Parikh Conservative Hybrid Fund share 6% of their portfolios. Two funds this different are doing different things; whether that is what you want is a separate question.
Side by side
record, cost, returns, drawdown, size
| Measure | UTI Conservative Hybrid | Parag Parikh Conservative Hybrid |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Conservative Hybrid | Conservative Hybrid |
| Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P4 | 65% of 109 | 100% of 29 |
| Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P5 | 0.68% | 0.33% |
| Portfolio turned over a year P1 | 12% | 8% |
| Run by P7 | Amit Premchandani · 4.7 yrs | Raj Mehta · 5.3 yrs |
| 1-year return | 1.7% | 4.8% |
| 3 years p.a. | 7.8% | 9.3% |
| 5 years p.a. | 7.1% | 9.2% |
| Deepest fall (max drawdown) | −4.5% | −2.2% |
| Assets (AUM) | ₹1,665 Cr | ₹3,450 Cr |
| Disclosed history | 8.3 yrs | 5.0 yrs |
| Holdings · top ten weight | 110 · 42% | 81 · 40% |
Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — a category error is the first thing the postulates refuse to make. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.