Compare
Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is Σ min(weight) over the stocks both hold, from the latest disclosures.
Overlap
share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common
| UTI - Mid Cap | Kotak Mid Cap | |
|---|---|---|
| UTI - Mid Cap | itself | 0% |
| Kotak Mid Cap | 0% | itself |
Most alike: UTI - Mid Cap Fund and Kotak Mid Cap Fund share 0% of their portfolios. Two funds this different are doing different things; whether that is what you want is a separate question.
Side by side
record, cost, returns, drawdown, size
| Measure | UTI - Mid Cap | Kotak Mid Cap |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Mid Cap | Mid Cap |
| Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P4 | 23% of 109 | 83% of 109 |
| Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P5 | 1.02% | 1.44% |
| Portfolio turned over a year P1 | 82% | not measured |
| Run by P7 | Vishal Chopda · 1.3 yrs | not known |
| 1-year return | 3.4% | 4.8% |
| 3 years p.a. | 12.3% | 18.1% |
| 5 years p.a. | 12.1% | 16.8% |
| Deepest fall (max drawdown) | −22.7% | −20.9% |
| Assets (AUM) | ₹12,211 Cr | ₹64,136 Cr |
| Disclosed history | 12 yrs | — |
| Holdings · top ten weight | 84 · 24% | — · — |
Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — a category error is the first thing the postulates refuse to make. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.