Compare
Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is Σ min(weight) over the stocks both hold, from the latest disclosures.
Overlap
share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common
| Reliance Fixed Term Scheme | ICICI Prudential Gilt Fund Treasury Plan PF Option | |
|---|---|---|
| Reliance Fixed Term Scheme | itself | 0% |
| ICICI Prudential Gilt Fund Treasury Plan PF Option | 0% | itself |
Most alike: Reliance Fixed Term Scheme and ICICI Prudential Gilt Fund Treasury Plan PF Option share 0% of their portfolios. Two funds this different are doing different things; whether that is what you want is a separate question.
Side by side
record, cost, returns, drawdown, size
| Measure | Reliance Fixed Term Scheme | ICICI Prudential Gilt Fund Treasury Plan PF Option |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Gilt | Gilt |
| Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P4 | not measured | not measured |
| Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P5 | not measured | 0.49% |
| Portfolio turned over a year P1 | not measured | not measured |
| Run by P7 | not known | not known |
| 1-year return | — | 4.1% |
| 3 years p.a. | — | 9.7% |
| 5 years p.a. | — | — |
| Deepest fall (max drawdown) | not computed | not computed |
| Assets (AUM) | — | ₹16 Cr |
| Disclosed history | — | 4.4 yrs |
| Holdings · top ten weight | — · — | 6 · 100% |
Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — a category error is the first thing the postulates refuse to make. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.