Compare
Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is Σ min(weight) over the stocks both hold, from the latest disclosures.
Overlap
share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common
| ICICI Prudential Gilt Fund Investment Plan PF Option | FT India Gilt | |
|---|---|---|
| ICICI Prudential Gilt Fund Investment Plan PF Option | itself | 0% |
| FT India Gilt | 0% | itself |
Most alike: ICICI Prudential Gilt Fund Investment Plan PF Option and FT India Gilt Fund share 0% of their portfolios. Two funds this different are doing different things; whether that is what you want is a separate question.
Side by side
record, cost, returns, drawdown, size
| Measure | ICICI Prudential Gilt Fund Investment Plan PF Option | FT India Gilt |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Gilt | Gilt |
| Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P4 | not measured | not measured |
| Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P5 | 0.34% | not measured |
| Portfolio turned over a year P1 | not measured | not measured |
| Run by P7 | not known | not known |
| 1-year return | 3.3% | — |
| 3 years p.a. | 8.6% | — |
| 5 years p.a. | — | — |
| Deepest fall (max drawdown) | not computed | not computed |
| Assets (AUM) | ₹329 Cr | — |
| Disclosed history | 4.4 yrs | — |
| Holdings · top ten weight | 10 · 100% | — · — |
Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — a category error is the first thing the postulates refuse to make. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.