Compare
Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is Σ min(weight) over the stocks both hold, from the latest disclosures. All 6,937 schemes are searchable — by scheme name, by fund house, or by the category you know them as.
4 of 6 chosen
Add another Large Cap fund — overlap says most about funds of one kind:
Overlap
share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common
| each fundagainst each other | HDFC Large Cap | Nippon India Value | UTI Value | Mirae Asset Large Cap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HDFC Large CapLarge Cap | itself | HDFC Large Cap and Nippon India Value share 35% of their portfolios | HDFC Large Cap and UTI Value share 39% of their portfolios | HDFC Large Cap and Mirae Asset Large Cap share 49% of their portfolios |
| Nippon India ValueValue | Nippon India Value and HDFC Large Cap share 35% of their portfolios | itself | Nippon India Value and UTI Value share 40% of their portfolios | Nippon India Value and Mirae Asset Large Cap share 45% of their portfolios |
| UTI ValueValue | UTI Value and HDFC Large Cap share 39% of their portfolios | UTI Value and Nippon India Value share 40% of their portfolios | itself | UTI Value and Mirae Asset Large Cap share 49% of their portfolios |
| Mirae Asset Large CapLarge Cap | Mirae Asset Large Cap and HDFC Large Cap share 49% of their portfolios | Mirae Asset Large Cap and Nippon India Value share 45% of their portfolios | Mirae Asset Large Cap and UTI Value share 49% of their portfolios | itself |
Closest pair: HDFC Large Cap Fund and Mirae Asset Large Cap Fund share 49% of their portfolios. Most of what each of them holds, the other does not; whether two funds this far apart belong in one portfolio is a separate question.
Read a cell as: of everything the two funds hold, this much is the same holding at the same weight. It is symmetric — the pair above the diagonal and the pair below it are one number shown twice. A pair at 0% holds nothing in common, which is a real answer, and often the useful one.
Side by side
record, cost, returns, drawdown, size
| Measure | HDFC Large Cap | Nippon India Value | UTI Value | Mirae Asset Large Cap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Category | Large Cap | Value | Value | Large Cap |
| Fund house | HDFC Asset Management Company Limited | Nippon Life India Asset Management Limited | UTI Asset Mgmt. Co. Ltd. | Mirae Asset Investment Managers (India) Pvt. Ltd |
| Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P4 | 51% of 109 | 93% of 109 | 37% of 109 | 64% of 109 |
| Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P5 | 0.70% points | 0.82% points | 0.79% points | 1.06% points |
| Portfolio turned over a year P1 | 45% | 82% | 47% | 53% |
| Run by P7 | not known | Meenakshi Dawar · 8.3 yrs | Amit Premchandani · 8.6 yrs | Gaurav Misra · 7.7 yrs |
| 1-year return | −3.2% | −2.8% | −4.1% | −3.3% |
| 3 years p.a. | 9.1% | 14.0% | 12.1% | 8.6% |
| 5 years p.a. | 10.6% | 13.4% | 11.0% | 7.8% |
| Deepest fall (max drawdown) | −16.4% | −17.6% | −17.2% | −15.8% |
| Assets (AUM) | ₹40,166 Cr | ₹8,875 Cr | ₹9,603 Cr | ₹38,599 Cr |
| Disclosed history | 1.8 yrs | 12 yrs | 12 yrs | 5.1 yrs |
| Holdings · top ten weight | 50 · 53% | 94 · 36% | 71 · 41% | 76 · 48% |
Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — a category error is the first thing the postulates refuse to make. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.