Compare
Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is Σ min(weight) over the stocks both hold, from the latest disclosures.
Overlap
share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common
| LIC MF Conservative Hybrid | ICICI Prudential Conservative Hybrid | |
|---|---|---|
| LIC MF Conservative Hybrid | itself | 3% |
| ICICI Prudential Conservative Hybrid | 3% | itself |
Most alike: LIC MF Conservative Hybrid Fund and ICICI Prudential Conservative Hybrid Fund share 3% of their portfolios. Two funds this different are doing different things; whether that is what you want is a separate question.
Side by side
record, cost, returns, drawdown, size
| Measure | LIC MF Conservative Hybrid | ICICI Prudential Conservative Hybrid |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Conservative Hybrid | Conservative Hybrid |
| Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P4 | 9% of 109 | 100% of 109 |
| Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P5 | 0.93% | 0.83% |
| Portfolio turned over a year P1 | 22% | 2% |
| Run by P7 | Pratik Shroff · ≥ 7 mo | Manish Banthia · 13 yrs |
| 1-year return | 3.9% | 3.1% |
| 3 years p.a. | 6.6% | 8.8% |
| 5 years p.a. | 5.7% | 8.3% |
| Deepest fall (max drawdown) | −3.1% | −3.0% |
| Assets (AUM) | ₹47 Cr | ₹3,355 Cr |
| Disclosed history | 10 yrs | 2 mo |
| Holdings · top ten weight | 33 · 83% | 137 · 25% |
Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — a category error is the first thing the postulates refuse to make. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.