ANVESHAN Create account

Compare

Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is Σ min(weight) over the stocks both hold, from the latest disclosures. All 6,937 schemes are searchable — by scheme name, by fund house, or by the category you know them as.

4 of 6 chosen

  • JM Dynamic Term FundDynamic Term×
  • Nippon India Dynamic Term FundDynamic Term×
  • SBI DYNAMIC TERM FUNDDynamic Term×
  • Aditya Birla Sun Life Dynamic Term FundDynamic Term×

Overlap

share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common

each fundagainst each otherJM Dynamic TermNippon India Dynamic TermSBI DYNAMIC TERMAditya Birla Sun Life Dynamic Term
JM Dynamic TermDynamic Term
itself
JM Dynamic Term and Nippon India Dynamic Term share 2% of their portfolios
JM Dynamic Term and SBI DYNAMIC TERM share 0% of their portfolios
JM Dynamic Term and Aditya Birla Sun Life Dynamic Term share 0% of their portfolios
Nippon India Dynamic TermDynamic Term
Nippon India Dynamic Term and JM Dynamic Term share 2% of their portfolios
itself
Nippon India Dynamic Term and SBI DYNAMIC TERM share 0% of their portfolios
Nippon India Dynamic Term and Aditya Birla Sun Life Dynamic Term share 0% of their portfolios
SBI DYNAMIC TERMDynamic Term
SBI DYNAMIC TERM and JM Dynamic Term share 0% of their portfolios
SBI DYNAMIC TERM and Nippon India Dynamic Term share 0% of their portfolios
itself
SBI DYNAMIC TERM and Aditya Birla Sun Life Dynamic Term share 0% of their portfolios
Aditya Birla Sun Life Dynamic TermDynamic Term
Aditya Birla Sun Life Dynamic Term and JM Dynamic Term share 0% of their portfolios
Aditya Birla Sun Life Dynamic Term and Nippon India Dynamic Term share 0% of their portfolios
Aditya Birla Sun Life Dynamic Term and SBI DYNAMIC TERM share 0% of their portfolios
itself

No two of these hold much of the same portfolio. The closest pair, JM Dynamic Term Fund and Nippon India Dynamic Term Fund, share 2%. That is a number, not a resemblance: at this level the two funds are doing separate things, and nothing here says whether that is what you wanted.

Read a cell as: of everything the two funds hold, this much is the same holding at the same weight. It is symmetric — the pair above the diagonal and the pair below it are one number shown twice. A pair at 0% holds nothing in common, which is a real answer, and often the useful one.

Side by side

record, cost, returns, drawdown, size

MeasureJM Dynamic TermNippon India Dynamic TermSBI DYNAMIC TERMAditya Birla Sun Life Dynamic Term
CategoryDynamic TermDynamic TermDynamic TermDynamic Term
Fund houseJM Financial Asset Management LimitedNippon Life India Asset Management LimitedSBI Funds Management LimitedAditya Birla Sun Life AMC Limited
Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P425% of 10919% of 10995% of 10948% of 109
Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P50.57% points0.57% points0.79% points0.64% points
Portfolio turned over a year P1not measurednot measurednot measurednot measured
Run by P7Ruchi Fozdar · 2.5 yrsVivek Sharma · 6.2 yrsSudhir Agarwal · ≥ 3 moMohit Sharma · ≥ 3 mo
1-year return3.9%5.2%5.5%5.8%
3 years p.a.6.8%7.2%7.4%7.6%
5 years p.a.6.0%6.2%6.8%7.3%
Deepest fall (max drawdown)−1.2%−1.5%−1.6%−1.1%
Assets (AUM)₹53 Cr₹3,911 Cr₹3,678 Cr₹1,458 Cr
Disclosed history13 yrs14 yrs5.8 yrs13 yrs
Holdings · top ten weight17 · 80%100 · 40%19 · 82%47 · 56%

Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — a category error is the first thing the postulates refuse to make. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.