Compare
Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is Σ min(weight) over the stocks both hold, from the latest disclosures. All 6,937 schemes are searchable — by scheme name, by fund house, or by the category you know them as.
4 of 6 chosen
Add another Value fund — overlap says most about funds of one kind:
Overlap
share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common
| each fundagainst each other | HDFC Value | HDFC Multi Cap | ICICI Prudential Multi Cap | Bandhan Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HDFC ValueValue | itself | HDFC Value and HDFC Multi Cap share 50% of their portfolios | HDFC Value and ICICI Prudential Multi Cap share 11% of their portfolios | HDFC Value and Bandhan Value share 31% of their portfolios |
| HDFC Multi CapMulti Cap | HDFC Multi Cap and HDFC Value share 50% of their portfolios | itself | HDFC Multi Cap and ICICI Prudential Multi Cap share 17% of their portfolios | HDFC Multi Cap and Bandhan Value share 23% of their portfolios |
| ICICI Prudential Multi CapMulti Cap | ICICI Prudential Multi Cap and HDFC Value share 11% of their portfolios | ICICI Prudential Multi Cap and HDFC Multi Cap share 17% of their portfolios | itself | ICICI Prudential Multi Cap and Bandhan Value share 5% of their portfolios |
| Bandhan ValueValue | Bandhan Value and HDFC Value share 31% of their portfolios | Bandhan Value and HDFC Multi Cap share 23% of their portfolios | Bandhan Value and ICICI Prudential Multi Cap share 5% of their portfolios | itself |
Closest pair: HDFC Value Fund and HDFC Multi Cap Fund share 50% of their portfolios. Most of what each of them holds, the other does not; whether two funds this far apart belong in one portfolio is a separate question.
Read a cell as: of everything the two funds hold, this much is the same holding at the same weight. It is symmetric — the pair above the diagonal and the pair below it are one number shown twice. A pair at 0% holds nothing in common, which is a real answer, and often the useful one.
Side by side
record, cost, returns, drawdown, size
| Measure | HDFC Value | HDFC Multi Cap | ICICI Prudential Multi Cap | Bandhan Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Category | Value | Multi Cap | Multi Cap | Value |
| Fund house | HDFC Asset Management Company Limited | HDFC Asset Management Company Limited | ICICI Prudential Asset Management Company Limited | Bandhan AMC Limited |
| Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P4 | 53% of 109 | 73% of 22 | 49% of 109 | 67% of 109 |
| Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P5 | 1.07% points | 1.30% points | 1.03% points | 1.17% points |
| Portfolio turned over a year P1 | 54% | 79% | 108% | 68% |
| Run by P7 | not known | not known | Lalit Kumar · 1.1 yrs | Daylynn Pinto · ≥ 3.5 yrs |
| 1-year return | 5.9% | −2.2% | 6.8% | −1.1% |
| 3 years p.a. | 16.2% | 12.0% | 15.9% | 10.4% |
| 5 years p.a. | 13.9% | — | 15.0% | 12.8% |
| Deepest fall (max drawdown) | −18.2% | −20.2% | −17.3% | −17.9% |
| Assets (AUM) | ₹8,150 Cr | ₹20,765 Cr | ₹19,305 Cr | ₹10,051 Cr |
| Disclosed history | 10 mo | 2.4 yrs | 11 yrs | 4.9 yrs |
| Holdings · top ten weight | 80 · 32% | 127 · 23% | 167 · 24% | 68 · 47% |
Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — a category error is the first thing the postulates refuse to make. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.