Compare
Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is Σ min(weight) over the stocks both hold, from the latest disclosures. All 6,937 schemes are searchable — by scheme name, by fund house, or by the category you know them as.
4 of 6 chosen
Add another Value fund — overlap says most about funds of one kind:
Overlap
share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common
| each fundagainst each other | HDFC Value | Nippon India Value | Quant Small Cap | ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HDFC ValueValue | itself | HDFC Value and Nippon India Value share 34% of their portfolios | HDFC Value and Quant Small Cap share 4% of their portfolios | HDFC Value and ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) share 37% of their portfolios |
| Nippon India ValueValue | Nippon India Value and HDFC Value share 34% of their portfolios | itself | Nippon India Value and Quant Small Cap share 5% of their portfolios | Nippon India Value and ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) share 37% of their portfolios |
| Quant Small CapSmall Cap | Quant Small Cap and HDFC Value share 4% of their portfolios | Quant Small Cap and Nippon India Value share 5% of their portfolios | itself | Quant Small Cap and ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) share 3% of their portfolios |
| ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund)Value | ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) and HDFC Value share 37% of their portfolios | ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) and Nippon India Value share 37% of their portfolios | ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) and Quant Small Cap share 3% of their portfolios | itself |
Closest pair: HDFC Value Fund and ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) share 37% of their portfolios. Most of what each of them holds, the other does not; whether two funds this far apart belong in one portfolio is a separate question.
Read a cell as: of everything the two funds hold, this much is the same holding at the same weight. It is symmetric — the pair above the diagonal and the pair below it are one number shown twice. A pair at 0% holds nothing in common, which is a real answer, and often the useful one.
Side by side
record, cost, returns, drawdown, size
| Measure | HDFC Value | Nippon India Value | Quant Small Cap | ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Category | Value | Value | Small Cap | Value |
| Fund house | HDFC Asset Management Company Limited | Nippon Life India Asset Management Limited | quant Money Managers Limited | ICICI Prudential Asset Management Company Limited |
| Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P4 | 53% of 109 | 93% of 109 | 69% of 109 | 68% of 109 |
| Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P5 | 1.07% points | 0.82% points | 0.84% points | 0.83% points |
| Portfolio turned over a year P1 | 54% | 82% | 75% | 58% |
| Run by P7 | not known | Meenakshi Dawar · 8.3 yrs | Ankit Pande · ≥ 2.5 yrs | Dharmesh Kakkad · 5.7 yrs |
| 1-year return | 5.9% | −2.8% | 12.7% | −5.4% |
| 3 years p.a. | 16.2% | 14.0% | 18.5% | 11.5% |
| 5 years p.a. | 13.9% | 13.4% | 19.2% | 13.5% |
| Deepest fall (max drawdown) | −18.2% | −17.6% | −24.4% | −14.0% |
| Assets (AUM) | ₹8,150 Cr | ₹8,875 Cr | ₹34,069 Cr | ₹60,800 Cr |
| Disclosed history | 10 mo | 12 yrs | 7.5 yrs | 13 yrs |
| Holdings · top ten weight | 80 · 32% | 94 · 36% | 120 · 43% | 66 · 52% |
Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — a category error is the first thing the postulates refuse to make. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.