Compare
Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is Σ min(weight) over the stocks both hold, from the latest disclosures. All 6,937 schemes are searchable — by scheme name, by fund house, or by the category you know them as.
5 of 6 chosen
Add another Value fund — overlap says most about funds of one kind:
Overlap
share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common
| each fundagainst each other | Tata Value | Kotak Multi Cap | UTI - Flexi Cap Fund. | Bandhan Value | Nippon India Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tata ValueValue | itself | Tata Value and Kotak Multi Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Multi Cap | Tata Value and UTI - Flexi Cap Fund. share 16% of their portfolios | Tata Value and Bandhan Value share 20% of their portfolios | Tata Value and Nippon India Value share 19% of their portfolios |
| Kotak Multi CapMulti Cap | Kotak Multi Cap and Tata Value: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Multi Cap | itself | Kotak Multi Cap and UTI - Flexi Cap Fund.: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Multi Cap | Kotak Multi Cap and Bandhan Value: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Multi Cap | Kotak Multi Cap and Nippon India Value: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Multi Cap |
| UTI - Flexi Cap Fund.Flexi Cap | UTI - Flexi Cap Fund. and Tata Value share 16% of their portfolios | UTI - Flexi Cap Fund. and Kotak Multi Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Multi Cap | itself | UTI - Flexi Cap Fund. and Bandhan Value share 19% of their portfolios | UTI - Flexi Cap Fund. and Nippon India Value share 26% of their portfolios |
| Bandhan ValueValue | Bandhan Value and Tata Value share 20% of their portfolios | Bandhan Value and Kotak Multi Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Multi Cap | Bandhan Value and UTI - Flexi Cap Fund. share 19% of their portfolios | itself | Bandhan Value and Nippon India Value share 37% of their portfolios |
| Nippon India ValueValue | Nippon India Value and Tata Value share 19% of their portfolios | Nippon India Value and Kotak Multi Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Multi Cap | Nippon India Value and UTI - Flexi Cap Fund. share 26% of their portfolios | Nippon India Value and Bandhan Value share 37% of their portfolios | itself |
Closest pair: Bandhan Value Fund and Nippon India Value Fund share 37% of their portfolios. Most of what each of them holds, the other does not; whether two funds this far apart belong in one portfolio is a separate question.
Kotak Multi Cap has no portfolio on file, so its row is blank rather than zero — that is an absence in our data, not a finding about the fund.
Read a cell as: of everything the two funds hold, this much is the same holding at the same weight. It is symmetric — the pair above the diagonal and the pair below it are one number shown twice. A pair at 0% holds nothing in common, which is a real answer, and often the useful one.
Side by side
record, cost, returns, drawdown, size
| Measure | Tata Value | Kotak Multi Cap | UTI - Flexi Cap Fund. | Bandhan Value | Nippon India Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Category | Value | Multi Cap | Flexi Cap | Value | Value |
| Fund house | Tata Asset Management Limited | Kotak Mahindra Asset Management Company Limited. | UTI Asset Mgmt. Co. Ltd. | Bandhan AMC Limited | Nippon Life India Asset Management Limited |
| Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P4 | 63% of 109 | 100% of 24 | 40% of 109 | 67% of 109 | 93% of 109 |
| Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P5 | 1.15% points | 1.62% points | 0.68% points | 1.17% points | 0.82% points |
| Portfolio turned over a year P1 | 81% | not measured | 41% | 68% | 82% |
| Run by P7 | Sonam Udasi · ≥ 9 mo | not known | Ajay Tyagi · 11 yrs | Daylynn Pinto · ≥ 3.5 yrs | Meenakshi Dawar · 8.3 yrs |
| 1-year return | 0.2% | 4.2% | −2.3% | −1.1% | −2.8% |
| 3 years p.a. | 12.9% | 17.3% | 8.4% | 10.4% | 14.0% |
| 5 years p.a. | 13.3% | — | 4.9% | 12.8% | 13.4% |
| Deepest fall (max drawdown) | −20.9% | −21.0% | −20.1% | −17.9% | −17.6% |
| Assets (AUM) | ₹8,440 Cr | ₹25,937 Cr | ₹23,434 Cr | ₹10,051 Cr | ₹8,875 Cr |
| Disclosed history | 11 yrs | — | 12 yrs | 4.9 yrs | 12 yrs |
| Holdings · top ten weight | 41 · 52% | none disclosed | 62 · 44% | 68 · 47% | 94 · 36% |
Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — a category error is the first thing the postulates refuse to make. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.