Compare
Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is Σ min(weight) over the stocks both hold, from the latest disclosures. All 6,937 schemes are searchable — by scheme name, by fund house, or by the category you know them as.
4 of 6 chosen
Add another Value fund — overlap says most about funds of one kind:
Overlap
share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common
| each fundagainst each other | Tata Value | Motilal Oswal Midcap | BANDHAN Small Cap | Nippon India Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tata ValueValue | itself | Tata Value and Motilal Oswal Midcap share 12% of their portfolios | Tata Value and BANDHAN Small Cap share 3% of their portfolios | Tata Value and Nippon India Value share 19% of their portfolios |
| Motilal Oswal MidcapMid Cap | Motilal Oswal Midcap and Tata Value share 12% of their portfolios | itself | Motilal Oswal Midcap and BANDHAN Small Cap share 3% of their portfolios | Motilal Oswal Midcap and Nippon India Value share 3% of their portfolios |
| BANDHAN Small CapSmall Cap | BANDHAN Small Cap and Tata Value share 3% of their portfolios | BANDHAN Small Cap and Motilal Oswal Midcap share 3% of their portfolios | itself | BANDHAN Small Cap and Nippon India Value share 10% of their portfolios |
| Nippon India ValueValue | Nippon India Value and Tata Value share 19% of their portfolios | Nippon India Value and Motilal Oswal Midcap share 3% of their portfolios | Nippon India Value and BANDHAN Small Cap share 10% of their portfolios | itself |
Closest pair: Tata Value Fund and Nippon India Value Fund share 19% of their portfolios. Most of what each of them holds, the other does not; whether two funds this far apart belong in one portfolio is a separate question.
Read a cell as: of everything the two funds hold, this much is the same holding at the same weight. It is symmetric — the pair above the diagonal and the pair below it are one number shown twice. A pair at 0% holds nothing in common, which is a real answer, and often the useful one.
Side by side
record, cost, returns, drawdown, size
| Measure | Tata Value | Motilal Oswal Midcap | BANDHAN Small Cap | Nippon India Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Category | Value | Mid Cap | Small Cap | Value |
| Fund house | Tata Asset Management Limited | Motilal Oswal Asset Management Company Limited | Bandhan AMC Limited | Nippon Life India Asset Management Limited |
| Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P4 | 63% of 109 | 54% of 109 | 75% of 44 | 93% of 109 |
| Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P5 | 1.15% points | 1.37% points | 2.00% points | 0.82% points |
| Portfolio turned over a year P1 | 81% | 92% | 68% | 82% |
| Run by P7 | Sonam Udasi · ≥ 9 mo | Rakesh Shetty · 3.8 yrs | Kirthi Jain · ≥ 2.8 yrs | Meenakshi Dawar · 8.3 yrs |
| 1-year return | 0.2% | −0.5% | 10.4% | −2.8% |
| 3 years p.a. | 12.9% | 19.5% | 25.3% | 14.0% |
| 5 years p.a. | 13.3% | 21.1% | 20.0% | 13.4% |
| Deepest fall (max drawdown) | −20.9% | −28.9% | −22.8% | −17.6% |
| Assets (AUM) | ₹8,440 Cr | ₹41,706 Cr | ₹31,103 Cr | ₹8,875 Cr |
| Disclosed history | 11 yrs | 4.0 yrs | 4.3 yrs | 12 yrs |
| Holdings · top ten weight | 41 · 52% | 32 · 54% | 265 · 30% | 94 · 36% |
Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — a category error is the first thing the postulates refuse to make. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.