ANVESHAN Create account

Compare

Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is Σ min(weight) over the stocks both hold, from the latest disclosures. All 6,937 schemes are searchable — by scheme name, by fund house, or by the category you know them as.

4 of 6 chosen

  • Tata Value FundValue×
  • Mirae Asset Large Cap FundLarge Cap×
  • ICICI Prudential Large Cap Fund (erstwhile Bluechip Fund)Large Cap×
  • UTI Value FundValue×

Overlap

share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common

each fundagainst each otherTata ValueMirae Asset Large CapICICI Prudential Large Cap Fund (erstwhile Bluechip Fund)UTI Value
Tata ValueValue
itself
Tata Value and Mirae Asset Large Cap share 25% of their portfolios
Tata Value and ICICI Prudential Large Cap Fund (erstwhile Bluechip Fund) share 24% of their portfolios
Tata Value and UTI Value share 21% of their portfolios
Mirae Asset Large CapLarge Cap
Mirae Asset Large Cap and Tata Value share 25% of their portfolios
itself
Mirae Asset Large Cap and ICICI Prudential Large Cap Fund (erstwhile Bluechip Fund) share 62% of their portfolios
Mirae Asset Large Cap and UTI Value share 49% of their portfolios
ICICI Prudential Large Cap Fund (erstwhile Bluechip Fund)Large Cap
ICICI Prudential Large Cap Fund (erstwhile Bluechip Fund) and Tata Value share 24% of their portfolios
ICICI Prudential Large Cap Fund (erstwhile Bluechip Fund) and Mirae Asset Large Cap share 62% of their portfolios
itself
ICICI Prudential Large Cap Fund (erstwhile Bluechip Fund) and UTI Value share 50% of their portfolios
UTI ValueValue
UTI Value and Tata Value share 21% of their portfolios
UTI Value and Mirae Asset Large Cap share 49% of their portfolios
UTI Value and ICICI Prudential Large Cap Fund (erstwhile Bluechip Fund) share 50% of their portfolios
itself

Closest pair: Mirae Asset Large Cap Fund and ICICI Prudential Large Cap Fund (erstwhile Bluechip Fund) share 62% of their portfolios. Holding both is closer to holding one twice than to diversifying.

Read a cell as: of everything the two funds hold, this much is the same holding at the same weight. It is symmetric — the pair above the diagonal and the pair below it are one number shown twice. A pair at 0% holds nothing in common, which is a real answer, and often the useful one.

Side by side

record, cost, returns, drawdown, size

MeasureTata ValueMirae Asset Large CapICICI Prudential Large Cap Fund (erstwhile Bluechip Fund)UTI Value
CategoryValueLarge CapLarge CapValue
Fund houseTata Asset Management LimitedMirae Asset Investment Managers (India) Pvt. LtdICICI Prudential Asset Management Company LimitedUTI Asset Mgmt. Co. Ltd.
Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P463% of 10964% of 10990% of 10937% of 109
Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P51.15% points1.06% points0.81% points0.79% points
Portfolio turned over a year P181%53%45%47%
Run by P7Sonam Udasi · ≥ 9 moGaurav Misra · 7.7 yrsVaibhav Dusad · 5.7 yrsAmit Premchandani · 8.6 yrs
1-year return0.2%−3.3%−5.3%−4.1%
3 years p.a.12.9%8.6%10.6%12.1%
5 years p.a.13.3%7.8%10.9%11.0%
Deepest fall (max drawdown)−20.9%−15.8%−15.4%−17.2%
Assets (AUM)₹8,440 Cr₹38,599 Cr₹80,822 Cr₹9,603 Cr
Disclosed history11 yrs5.1 yrs13 yrs12 yrs
Holdings · top ten weight41 · 52%76 · 48%93 · 47%71 · 41%

Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — a category error is the first thing the postulates refuse to make. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.