ANVESHAN Create account

Compare

Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is Σ min(weight) over the stocks both hold, from the latest disclosures. All 6,937 schemes are searchable — by scheme name, by fund house, or by the category you know them as.

5 of 6 chosen

  • Tata Value FundValue×
  • Nippon India Value FundValue×
  • Bandhan Value FundValue×
  • Nippon India Growth Mid Cap FundMid Cap×
  • UTI Value FundValue×

Overlap

share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common

each fundagainst each otherTata ValueNippon India ValueBandhan ValueNippon India Growth Mid CapUTI Value
Tata ValueValue
itself
Tata Value and Nippon India Value share 19% of their portfolios
Tata Value and Bandhan Value share 20% of their portfolios
Tata Value and Nippon India Growth Mid Cap share 11% of their portfolios
Tata Value and UTI Value share 21% of their portfolios
Nippon India ValueValue
Nippon India Value and Tata Value share 19% of their portfolios
itself
Nippon India Value and Bandhan Value share 37% of their portfolios
Nippon India Value and Nippon India Growth Mid Cap share 20% of their portfolios
Nippon India Value and UTI Value share 40% of their portfolios
Bandhan ValueValue
Bandhan Value and Tata Value share 20% of their portfolios
Bandhan Value and Nippon India Value share 37% of their portfolios
itself
Bandhan Value and Nippon India Growth Mid Cap share 9% of their portfolios
Bandhan Value and UTI Value share 40% of their portfolios
Nippon India Growth Mid CapMid Cap
Nippon India Growth Mid Cap and Tata Value share 11% of their portfolios
Nippon India Growth Mid Cap and Nippon India Value share 20% of their portfolios
Nippon India Growth Mid Cap and Bandhan Value share 9% of their portfolios
itself
Nippon India Growth Mid Cap and UTI Value share 13% of their portfolios
UTI ValueValue
UTI Value and Tata Value share 21% of their portfolios
UTI Value and Nippon India Value share 40% of their portfolios
UTI Value and Bandhan Value share 40% of their portfolios
UTI Value and Nippon India Growth Mid Cap share 13% of their portfolios
itself

Closest pair: Bandhan Value Fund and UTI Value Fund share 40% of their portfolios. Most of what each of them holds, the other does not; whether two funds this far apart belong in one portfolio is a separate question.

Read a cell as: of everything the two funds hold, this much is the same holding at the same weight. It is symmetric — the pair above the diagonal and the pair below it are one number shown twice. A pair at 0% holds nothing in common, which is a real answer, and often the useful one.

Side by side

record, cost, returns, drawdown, size

MeasureTata ValueNippon India ValueBandhan ValueNippon India Growth Mid CapUTI Value
CategoryValueValueValueMid CapValue
Fund houseTata Asset Management LimitedNippon Life India Asset Management LimitedBandhan AMC LimitedNippon Life India Asset Management LimitedUTI Asset Mgmt. Co. Ltd.
Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P463% of 10993% of 10967% of 10987% of 10937% of 109
Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P51.15% points0.82% points1.17% points0.86% points0.79% points
Portfolio turned over a year P181%82%68%52%47%
Run by P7Sonam Udasi · ≥ 9 moMeenakshi Dawar · 8.3 yrsDaylynn Pinto · ≥ 3.5 yrsRupesh Patel · 3.6 yrsAmit Premchandani · 8.6 yrs
1-year return0.2%−2.8%−1.1%7.0%−4.1%
3 years p.a.12.9%14.0%10.4%18.6%12.1%
5 years p.a.13.3%13.4%12.8%18.0%11.0%
Deepest fall (max drawdown)−20.9%−17.6%−17.9%−19.9%−17.2%
Assets (AUM)₹8,440 Cr₹8,875 Cr₹10,051 Cr₹48,143 Cr₹9,603 Cr
Disclosed history11 yrs12 yrs4.9 yrs14 yrs12 yrs
Holdings · top ten weight41 · 52%94 · 36%68 · 47%105 · 25%71 · 41%

Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — a category error is the first thing the postulates refuse to make. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.