Compare
Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is Σ min(weight) over the stocks both hold, from the latest disclosures. All 6,937 schemes are searchable — by scheme name, by fund house, or by the category you know them as.
3 of 6 chosen
Add another Ultra Short to Short Term fund — overlap says most about funds of one kind:
Overlap
share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common
| each fundagainst each other | ICICI Prudential Ultra Short to Short Term | Nippon India Ultra Short to Short Term | Tata Ultra Short to Short Term |
|---|---|---|---|
| ICICI Prudential Ultra Short to Short TermUltra Short to Short Term | itself | ICICI Prudential Ultra Short to Short Term and Nippon India Ultra Short to Short Term share 11% of their portfolios | ICICI Prudential Ultra Short to Short Term and Tata Ultra Short to Short Term share 0% of their portfolios |
| Nippon India Ultra Short to Short TermUltra Short to Short Term | Nippon India Ultra Short to Short Term and ICICI Prudential Ultra Short to Short Term share 11% of their portfolios | itself | Nippon India Ultra Short to Short Term and Tata Ultra Short to Short Term share 0% of their portfolios |
| Tata Ultra Short to Short TermUltra Short to Short Term | Tata Ultra Short to Short Term and ICICI Prudential Ultra Short to Short Term share 0% of their portfolios | Tata Ultra Short to Short Term and Nippon India Ultra Short to Short Term share 0% of their portfolios | itself |
Closest pair: ICICI Prudential Ultra Short to Short Term Fund and Nippon India Ultra Short to Short Term Fund share 11% of their portfolios. Most of what each of them holds, the other does not; whether two funds this far apart belong in one portfolio is a separate question.
Read a cell as: of everything the two funds hold, this much is the same holding at the same weight. It is symmetric — the pair above the diagonal and the pair below it are one number shown twice. A pair at 0% holds nothing in common, which is a real answer, and often the useful one.
Side by side
record, cost, returns, drawdown, size
| Measure | ICICI Prudential Ultra Short to Short Term | Nippon India Ultra Short to Short Term | Tata Ultra Short to Short Term |
|---|---|---|---|
| Category | Ultra Short to Short Term | Ultra Short to Short Term | Ultra Short to Short Term |
| Fund house | ICICI Prudential Asset Management Company Limited | Nippon Life India Asset Management Limited | Tata Asset Management Limited |
| Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P4 | 98% of 109 | 74% of 109 | 13% of 109 |
| Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P5 | 0.13% points | 0.53% points | 0.27% points |
| Portfolio turned over a year P1 | not measured | not measured | not measured |
| Run by P7 | Darshil Dedhia · 3.3 yrs | Vivek Sharma · 6.5 yrs | Amit Somani · ≥ 9 mo |
| 1-year return | 6.5% | 6.5% | 6.4% |
| 3 years p.a. | 7.4% | 7.5% | 7.3% |
| 5 years p.a. | 6.7% | 6.8% | 6.5% |
| Deepest fall (max drawdown) | −0.2% | −0.2% | −0.2% |
| Assets (AUM) | ₹21,200 Cr | ₹8,356 Cr | ₹6,002 Cr |
| Disclosed history | 2.2 yrs | 14 yrs | 1.3 yrs |
| Holdings · top ten weight | 139 · 27% | 112 · 26% | 77 · 34% |
Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — a category error is the first thing the postulates refuse to make. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.