Compare
Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is Σ min(weight) over the stocks both hold, from the latest disclosures. All 6,937 schemes are searchable — by scheme name, by fund house, or by the category you know them as.
3 of 6 chosen
Add another Large & Mid Cap fund — overlap says most about funds of one kind:
Overlap
share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common
| each fundagainst each other | SBI LARGE & MIDCAP | ICICI Prudential Large & Mid Cap | Mirae Asset Large & Midcap |
|---|---|---|---|
| SBI LARGE & MIDCAPLarge & Mid Cap | itself | SBI LARGE & MIDCAP and ICICI Prudential Large & Mid Cap share 19% of their portfolios | SBI LARGE & MIDCAP and Mirae Asset Large & Midcap share 29% of their portfolios |
| ICICI Prudential Large & Mid CapLarge & Mid Cap | ICICI Prudential Large & Mid Cap and SBI LARGE & MIDCAP share 19% of their portfolios | itself | ICICI Prudential Large & Mid Cap and Mirae Asset Large & Midcap share 25% of their portfolios |
| Mirae Asset Large & MidcapLarge & Mid Cap | Mirae Asset Large & Midcap and SBI LARGE & MIDCAP share 29% of their portfolios | Mirae Asset Large & Midcap and ICICI Prudential Large & Mid Cap share 25% of their portfolios | itself |
Closest pair: SBI LARGE & MIDCAP FUND and Mirae Asset Large & Midcap Fund share 29% of their portfolios. Most of what each of them holds, the other does not; whether two funds this far apart belong in one portfolio is a separate question.
Read a cell as: of everything the two funds hold, this much is the same holding at the same weight. It is symmetric — the pair above the diagonal and the pair below it are one number shown twice. A pair at 0% holds nothing in common, which is a real answer, and often the useful one.
Side by side
record, cost, returns, drawdown, size
| Measure | SBI LARGE & MIDCAP | ICICI Prudential Large & Mid Cap | Mirae Asset Large & Midcap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Category | Large & Mid Cap | Large & Mid Cap | Large & Mid Cap |
| Fund house | SBI Funds Management Limited | ICICI Prudential Asset Management Company Limited | Mirae Asset Investment Managers (India) Pvt. Ltd |
| Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P4 | 37% of 109 | 53% of 109 | 63% of 109 |
| Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P5 | 0.81% points | 1.03% points | 1.08% points |
| Portfolio turned over a year P1 | 70% | 113% | 83% |
| Run by P7 | Saurabh Pant · ≥ 3 mo | Gaurav Jain · 3 mo | Neelesh Surana · 16 yrs |
| 1-year return | 0.9% | 0.8% | 2.6% |
| 3 years p.a. | 12.7% | 15.3% | 12.3% |
| 5 years p.a. | 13.4% | 14.9% | 10.8% |
| Deepest fall (max drawdown) | −14.2% | −14.8% | −19.5% |
| Assets (AUM) | ₹42,320 Cr | ₹33,351 Cr | ₹44,748 Cr |
| Disclosed history | 5.8 yrs | 13 yrs | 5.1 yrs |
| Holdings · top ten weight | 94 · 31% | 123 · 31% | 86 · 32% |
Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — a category error is the first thing the postulates refuse to make. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.