Compare
Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is Σ min(weight) over the stocks both hold, from the latest disclosures.
Overlap
share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common
| Sahara Liquid Fund - Fixed Pricing | Sahara Liquid Fund - Variable Pricing | |
|---|---|---|
| Sahara Liquid Fund - Fixed Pricing | itself | 0% |
| Sahara Liquid Fund - Variable Pricing | 0% | itself |
Most alike: Sahara Liquid Fund - Fixed Pricing and Sahara Liquid Fund - Variable Pricing share 0% of their portfolios. Two funds this different are doing different things; whether that is what you want is a separate question.
Side by side
record, cost, returns, drawdown, size
| Measure | Sahara Liquid Fund - Fixed Pricing | Sahara Liquid Fund - Variable Pricing |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Liquid | Liquid |
| Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P4 | not measured | not measured |
| Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P5 | -1.47% | 0.03% |
| Portfolio turned over a year P1 | not measured | not measured |
| Run by P7 | not known | not known |
| 1-year return | 0.0% | 4.6% |
| 3 years p.a. | 2.5% | 5.4% |
| 5 years p.a. | 4.0% | 5.9% |
| Deepest fall (max drawdown) | not computed | not computed |
| Assets (AUM) | ₹0 Cr | ₹8 Cr |
| Disclosed history | — | — |
| Holdings · top ten weight | — · — | — · — |
Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — a category error is the first thing the postulates refuse to make. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.