Compare
Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is Σ min(weight) over the stocks both hold, from the latest disclosures. All 6,937 schemes are searchable — by scheme name, by fund house, or by the category you know them as.
3 of 6 chosen
Add another Dynamic Term fund — overlap says most about funds of one kind:
Overlap
share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common
| each fundagainst each other | ICICI Prudential Dynamic Term | DSP Dynamic Term | SBI DYNAMIC TERM |
|---|---|---|---|
| ICICI Prudential Dynamic TermDynamic Term | itself | ICICI Prudential Dynamic Term and DSP Dynamic Term share 11% of their portfolios | ICICI Prudential Dynamic Term and SBI DYNAMIC TERM share 3% of their portfolios |
| DSP Dynamic TermDynamic Term | DSP Dynamic Term and ICICI Prudential Dynamic Term share 11% of their portfolios | itself | DSP Dynamic Term and SBI DYNAMIC TERM share 0% of their portfolios |
| SBI DYNAMIC TERMDynamic Term | SBI DYNAMIC TERM and ICICI Prudential Dynamic Term share 3% of their portfolios | SBI DYNAMIC TERM and DSP Dynamic Term share 0% of their portfolios | itself |
Closest pair: ICICI Prudential Dynamic Term Fund and DSP Dynamic Term Fund share 11% of their portfolios. Most of what each of them holds, the other does not; whether two funds this far apart belong in one portfolio is a separate question.
Read a cell as: of everything the two funds hold, this much is the same holding at the same weight. It is symmetric — the pair above the diagonal and the pair below it are one number shown twice. A pair at 0% holds nothing in common, which is a real answer, and often the useful one.
Side by side
record, cost, returns, drawdown, size
| Measure | ICICI Prudential Dynamic Term | DSP Dynamic Term | SBI DYNAMIC TERM |
|---|---|---|---|
| Category | Dynamic Term | Dynamic Term | Dynamic Term |
| Fund house | ICICI Prudential Asset Management Company Limited | DSP Asset Managers Private Limited | SBI Funds Management Limited |
| Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P4 | 100% of 109 | 55% of 109 | 95% of 109 |
| Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P5 | 0.54% points | 0.58% points | 0.79% points |
| Portfolio turned over a year P1 | not measured | not measured | not measured |
| Run by P7 | Manish Banthia · 14 yrs | Sandeep Yadav · ≥ 1.2 yrs | Sudhir Agarwal · ≥ 3 mo |
| 1-year return | 5.6% | 3.0% | 5.5% |
| 3 years p.a. | 7.7% | 6.2% | 7.4% |
| 5 years p.a. | 7.0% | 5.8% | 6.8% |
| Deepest fall (max drawdown) | −1.5% | −3.1% | −1.6% |
| Assets (AUM) | ₹13,261 Cr | ₹654 Cr | ₹3,678 Cr |
| Disclosed history | 13 yrs | 7.8 yrs | 5.8 yrs |
| Holdings · top ten weight | 98 · 39% | 17 · 85% | 19 · 82% |
Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — a category error is the first thing the postulates refuse to make. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.