Compare
Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is Σ min(weight) over the stocks both hold, from the latest disclosures.
Overlap
share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common
| LIC MF Children's | UTI Children's Hybrid | |
|---|---|---|
| LIC MF Children's | itself | 5% |
| UTI Children's Hybrid | 5% | itself |
Most alike: LIC MF Children's Fund and UTI Children's Hybrid Fund share 5% of their portfolios. Two funds this different are doing different things; whether that is what you want is a separate question.
Side by side
record, cost, returns, drawdown, size
| Measure | LIC MF Children's | UTI Children's Hybrid |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Children's | Children's |
| Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P4 | 0% of 109 | 4% of 109 |
| Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P5 | 0.93% | not measured |
| Portfolio turned over a year P1 | 115% | 18% |
| Run by P7 | Pratik Shroff · ≥ 7 mo | Sachin Trivedi · 1.3 yrs |
| 1-year return | 5.0% | −1.1% |
| 3 years p.a. | 9.7% | 6.4% |
| 5 years p.a. | 8.1% | 6.3% |
| Deepest fall (max drawdown) | −19.5% | −7.1% |
| Assets (AUM) | ₹16 Cr | ₹4,407 Cr |
| Disclosed history | 10 yrs | 8.3 yrs |
| Holdings · top ten weight | 38 · 46% | 139 · 36% |
Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — a category error is the first thing the postulates refuse to make. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.