Compare
Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is Σ min(weight) over the stocks both hold, from the latest disclosures. All 6,937 schemes are searchable — by scheme name, by fund house, or by the category you know them as.
4 of 6 chosen
Add another Multi Cap fund — overlap says most about funds of one kind:
Overlap
share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common
| each fundagainst each other | ICICI Prudential Multi Cap | SBI MultiCap | UTI Value | Nippon India Multi Cap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ICICI Prudential Multi CapMulti Cap | itself | ICICI Prudential Multi Cap and SBI MultiCap share 15% of their portfolios | ICICI Prudential Multi Cap and UTI Value share 8% of their portfolios | ICICI Prudential Multi Cap and Nippon India Multi Cap share 15% of their portfolios |
| SBI MultiCapMulti Cap | SBI MultiCap and ICICI Prudential Multi Cap share 15% of their portfolios | itself | SBI MultiCap and UTI Value share 19% of their portfolios | SBI MultiCap and Nippon India Multi Cap share 19% of their portfolios |
| UTI ValueValue | UTI Value and ICICI Prudential Multi Cap share 8% of their portfolios | UTI Value and SBI MultiCap share 19% of their portfolios | itself | UTI Value and Nippon India Multi Cap share 30% of their portfolios |
| Nippon India Multi CapMulti Cap | Nippon India Multi Cap and ICICI Prudential Multi Cap share 15% of their portfolios | Nippon India Multi Cap and SBI MultiCap share 19% of their portfolios | Nippon India Multi Cap and UTI Value share 30% of their portfolios | itself |
Closest pair: UTI Value Fund and Nippon India Multi Cap Fund share 30% of their portfolios. Most of what each of them holds, the other does not; whether two funds this far apart belong in one portfolio is a separate question.
Read a cell as: of everything the two funds hold, this much is the same holding at the same weight. It is symmetric — the pair above the diagonal and the pair below it are one number shown twice. A pair at 0% holds nothing in common, which is a real answer, and often the useful one.
Side by side
record, cost, returns, drawdown, size
| Measure | ICICI Prudential Multi Cap | SBI MultiCap | UTI Value | Nippon India Multi Cap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Category | Multi Cap | Multi Cap | Value | Multi Cap |
| Fund house | ICICI Prudential Asset Management Company Limited | SBI Funds Management Limited | UTI Asset Mgmt. Co. Ltd. | Nippon Life India Asset Management Limited |
| Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P4 | 49% of 109 | 0% of 19 | 37% of 109 | 50% of 109 |
| Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P5 | 1.03% points | 1.00% points | 0.79% points | 0.84% points |
| Portfolio turned over a year P1 | 108% | 85% | 47% | 66% |
| Run by P7 | Lalit Kumar · 1.1 yrs | Bectors Food · ≥ 3 mo | Amit Premchandani · 8.6 yrs | Sailesh Raj Bhan · 21 yrs |
| 1-year return | 6.8% | −0.6% | −4.1% | −1.4% |
| 3 years p.a. | 15.9% | 13.3% | 12.1% | 13.5% |
| 5 years p.a. | 15.0% | — | 11.0% | 16.4% |
| Deepest fall (max drawdown) | −17.3% | −15.1% | −17.2% | −18.6% |
| Assets (AUM) | ₹19,305 Cr | ₹24,138 Cr | ₹9,603 Cr | ₹53,760 Cr |
| Disclosed history | 11 yrs | 3.7 yrs | 12 yrs | 14 yrs |
| Holdings · top ten weight | 167 · 24% | 72 · 30% | 71 · 41% | 123 · 29% |
Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — a category error is the first thing the postulates refuse to make. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.