ANVESHAN Create account

Compare

Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is Σ min(weight) over the stocks both hold, from the latest disclosures. All 6,937 schemes are searchable — by scheme name, by fund house, or by the category you know them as.

4 of 6 chosen

  • ICICI Prudential Multi Cap FundMulti Cap×
  • Kotak Multi Cap FundMulti Cap · no portfolio disclosed×
  • HDFC Multi Cap FundMulti Cap×
  • Nippon India Value FundValue×

Overlap

share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common

each fundagainst each otherICICI Prudential Multi CapKotak Multi CapHDFC Multi CapNippon India Value
ICICI Prudential Multi CapMulti Cap
itself
ICICI Prudential Multi Cap and Kotak Multi Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Multi Cap
ICICI Prudential Multi Cap and HDFC Multi Cap share 17% of their portfolios
ICICI Prudential Multi Cap and Nippon India Value share 11% of their portfolios
Kotak Multi CapMulti Cap
Kotak Multi Cap and ICICI Prudential Multi Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Multi Cap
itself
Kotak Multi Cap and HDFC Multi Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Multi Cap
Kotak Multi Cap and Nippon India Value: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Multi Cap
HDFC Multi CapMulti Cap
HDFC Multi Cap and ICICI Prudential Multi Cap share 17% of their portfolios
HDFC Multi Cap and Kotak Multi Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Multi Cap
itself
HDFC Multi Cap and Nippon India Value share 31% of their portfolios
Nippon India ValueValue
Nippon India Value and ICICI Prudential Multi Cap share 11% of their portfolios
Nippon India Value and Kotak Multi Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Multi Cap
Nippon India Value and HDFC Multi Cap share 31% of their portfolios
itself

Closest pair: HDFC Multi Cap Fund and Nippon India Value Fund share 31% of their portfolios. Most of what each of them holds, the other does not; whether two funds this far apart belong in one portfolio is a separate question.

Kotak Multi Cap has no portfolio on file, so its row is blank rather than zero — that is an absence in our data, not a finding about the fund.

Read a cell as: of everything the two funds hold, this much is the same holding at the same weight. It is symmetric — the pair above the diagonal and the pair below it are one number shown twice. A pair at 0% holds nothing in common, which is a real answer, and often the useful one.

Side by side

record, cost, returns, drawdown, size

MeasureICICI Prudential Multi CapKotak Multi CapHDFC Multi CapNippon India Value
CategoryMulti CapMulti CapMulti CapValue
Fund houseICICI Prudential Asset Management Company LimitedKotak Mahindra Asset Management Company Limited.HDFC Asset Management Company LimitedNippon Life India Asset Management Limited
Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P449% of 109100% of 2473% of 2293% of 109
Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P51.03% points1.62% points1.30% points0.82% points
Portfolio turned over a year P1108%not measured79%82%
Run by P7Lalit Kumar · 1.1 yrsnot knownnot knownMeenakshi Dawar · 8.3 yrs
1-year return6.8%4.2%−2.2%−2.8%
3 years p.a.15.9%17.3%12.0%14.0%
5 years p.a.15.0%——13.4%
Deepest fall (max drawdown)−17.3%−21.0%−20.2%−17.6%
Assets (AUM)₹19,305 Cr₹25,937 Cr₹20,765 Cr₹8,875 Cr
Disclosed history11 yrs—2.4 yrs12 yrs
Holdings · top ten weight167 · 24%none disclosed127 · 23%94 · 36%

Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — a category error is the first thing the postulates refuse to make. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.