Compare
Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is Σ min(weight) over the stocks both hold, from the latest disclosures. All 6,937 schemes are searchable — by scheme name, by fund house, or by the category you know them as.
4 of 6 chosen
Add another Multi Cap fund — overlap says most about funds of one kind:
Overlap
share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common
| each fundagainst each other | ICICI Prudential Multi Cap | Tata Value | Nippon India Value | HDFC Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ICICI Prudential Multi CapMulti Cap | itself | ICICI Prudential Multi Cap and Tata Value share 9% of their portfolios | ICICI Prudential Multi Cap and Nippon India Value share 11% of their portfolios | ICICI Prudential Multi Cap and HDFC Value share 11% of their portfolios |
| Tata ValueValue | Tata Value and ICICI Prudential Multi Cap share 9% of their portfolios | itself | Tata Value and Nippon India Value share 19% of their portfolios | Tata Value and HDFC Value share 15% of their portfolios |
| Nippon India ValueValue | Nippon India Value and ICICI Prudential Multi Cap share 11% of their portfolios | Nippon India Value and Tata Value share 19% of their portfolios | itself | Nippon India Value and HDFC Value share 34% of their portfolios |
| HDFC ValueValue | HDFC Value and ICICI Prudential Multi Cap share 11% of their portfolios | HDFC Value and Tata Value share 15% of their portfolios | HDFC Value and Nippon India Value share 34% of their portfolios | itself |
Closest pair: Nippon India Value Fund and HDFC Value Fund share 34% of their portfolios. Most of what each of them holds, the other does not; whether two funds this far apart belong in one portfolio is a separate question.
Read a cell as: of everything the two funds hold, this much is the same holding at the same weight. It is symmetric — the pair above the diagonal and the pair below it are one number shown twice. A pair at 0% holds nothing in common, which is a real answer, and often the useful one.
Side by side
record, cost, returns, drawdown, size
| Measure | ICICI Prudential Multi Cap | Tata Value | Nippon India Value | HDFC Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Category | Multi Cap | Value | Value | Value |
| Fund house | ICICI Prudential Asset Management Company Limited | Tata Asset Management Limited | Nippon Life India Asset Management Limited | HDFC Asset Management Company Limited |
| Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P4 | 49% of 109 | 63% of 109 | 93% of 109 | 53% of 109 |
| Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P5 | 1.03% points | 1.15% points | 0.82% points | 1.07% points |
| Portfolio turned over a year P1 | 108% | 81% | 82% | 54% |
| Run by P7 | Lalit Kumar · 1.1 yrs | Sonam Udasi · ≥ 9 mo | Meenakshi Dawar · 8.3 yrs | not known |
| 1-year return | 6.8% | 0.2% | −2.8% | 5.9% |
| 3 years p.a. | 15.9% | 12.9% | 14.0% | 16.2% |
| 5 years p.a. | 15.0% | 13.3% | 13.4% | 13.9% |
| Deepest fall (max drawdown) | −17.3% | −20.9% | −17.6% | −18.2% |
| Assets (AUM) | ₹19,305 Cr | ₹8,440 Cr | ₹8,875 Cr | ₹8,150 Cr |
| Disclosed history | 11 yrs | 11 yrs | 12 yrs | 10 mo |
| Holdings · top ten weight | 167 · 24% | 41 · 52% | 94 · 36% | 80 · 32% |
Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — a category error is the first thing the postulates refuse to make. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.