Compare
Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is Σ min(weight) over the stocks both hold, from the latest disclosures. All 6,937 schemes are searchable — by scheme name, by fund house, or by the category you know them as.
3 of 6 chosen
Add another Multi Cap fund — overlap says most about funds of one kind:
Overlap
share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common
| each fundagainst each other | Nippon India Multi Cap | ICICI Prudential Flexi Cap | UTI - Flexi Cap Fund. |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nippon India Multi CapMulti Cap | itself | Nippon India Multi Cap and ICICI Prudential Flexi Cap share 26% of their portfolios | Nippon India Multi Cap and UTI - Flexi Cap Fund. share 23% of their portfolios |
| ICICI Prudential Flexi CapFlexi Cap | ICICI Prudential Flexi Cap and Nippon India Multi Cap share 26% of their portfolios | itself | ICICI Prudential Flexi Cap and UTI - Flexi Cap Fund. share 26% of their portfolios |
| UTI - Flexi Cap Fund.Flexi Cap | UTI - Flexi Cap Fund. and Nippon India Multi Cap share 23% of their portfolios | UTI - Flexi Cap Fund. and ICICI Prudential Flexi Cap share 26% of their portfolios | itself |
Closest pair: Nippon India Multi Cap Fund and ICICI Prudential Flexi Cap fund share 26% of their portfolios. Most of what each of them holds, the other does not; whether two funds this far apart belong in one portfolio is a separate question.
Read a cell as: of everything the two funds hold, this much is the same holding at the same weight. It is symmetric — the pair above the diagonal and the pair below it are one number shown twice. A pair at 0% holds nothing in common, which is a real answer, and often the useful one.
Side by side
record, cost, returns, drawdown, size
| Measure | Nippon India Multi Cap | ICICI Prudential Flexi Cap | UTI - Flexi Cap Fund. |
|---|---|---|---|
| Category | Multi Cap | Flexi Cap | Flexi Cap |
| Fund house | Nippon Life India Asset Management Limited | ICICI Prudential Asset Management Company Limited | UTI Asset Mgmt. Co. Ltd. |
| Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P4 | 50% of 109 | 96% of 27 | 40% of 109 |
| Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P5 | 0.84% points | 1.28% points | 0.68% points |
| Portfolio turned over a year P1 | 66% | 52% | 41% |
| Run by P7 | Sailesh Raj Bhan · 21 yrs | Rajat Chandak · 5.2 yrs | Ajay Tyagi · 11 yrs |
| 1-year return | −1.4% | 3.8% | −2.3% |
| 3 years p.a. | 13.5% | 16.2% | 8.4% |
| 5 years p.a. | 16.4% | 15.0% | 4.9% |
| Deepest fall (max drawdown) | −18.6% | −19.7% | −20.1% |
| Assets (AUM) | ₹53,760 Cr | ₹25,256 Cr | ₹23,434 Cr |
| Disclosed history | 14 yrs | 5.2 yrs | 12 yrs |
| Holdings · top ten weight | 123 · 29% | 80 · 45% | 62 · 44% |
Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — a category error is the first thing the postulates refuse to make. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.