ANVESHAN Create account

Compare

Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is Σ min(weight) over the stocks both hold, from the latest disclosures. All 6,937 schemes are searchable — by scheme name, by fund house, or by the category you know them as.

4 of 6 chosen

  • Nippon India Multi Cap FundMulti Cap×
  • Axis Midcap FundMid Cap×
  • Nippon India Growth Mid Cap FundMid Cap×
  • Kotak Multi Cap FundMulti Cap · no portfolio disclosed×

Overlap

share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common

each fundagainst each otherNippon India Multi CapAxis MidcapNippon India Growth Mid CapKotak Multi Cap
Nippon India Multi CapMulti Cap
itself
Nippon India Multi Cap and Axis Midcap share 21% of their portfolios
Nippon India Multi Cap and Nippon India Growth Mid Cap share 31% of their portfolios
Nippon India Multi Cap and Kotak Multi Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Multi Cap
Axis MidcapMid Cap
Axis Midcap and Nippon India Multi Cap share 21% of their portfolios
itself
Axis Midcap and Nippon India Growth Mid Cap share 42% of their portfolios
Axis Midcap and Kotak Multi Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Multi Cap
Nippon India Growth Mid CapMid Cap
Nippon India Growth Mid Cap and Nippon India Multi Cap share 31% of their portfolios
Nippon India Growth Mid Cap and Axis Midcap share 42% of their portfolios
itself
Nippon India Growth Mid Cap and Kotak Multi Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Multi Cap
Kotak Multi CapMulti Cap
Kotak Multi Cap and Nippon India Multi Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Multi Cap
Kotak Multi Cap and Axis Midcap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Multi Cap
Kotak Multi Cap and Nippon India Growth Mid Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Multi Cap
itself

Closest pair: Axis Midcap Fund and Nippon India Growth Mid Cap Fund share 42% of their portfolios. Most of what each of them holds, the other does not; whether two funds this far apart belong in one portfolio is a separate question.

Kotak Multi Cap has no portfolio on file, so its row is blank rather than zero — that is an absence in our data, not a finding about the fund.

Read a cell as: of everything the two funds hold, this much is the same holding at the same weight. It is symmetric — the pair above the diagonal and the pair below it are one number shown twice. A pair at 0% holds nothing in common, which is a real answer, and often the useful one.

Side by side

record, cost, returns, drawdown, size

MeasureNippon India Multi CapAxis MidcapNippon India Growth Mid CapKotak Multi Cap
CategoryMulti CapMid CapMid CapMulti Cap
Fund houseNippon Life India Asset Management LimitedAxis Asset Management Co. Ltd.Nippon Life India Asset Management LimitedKotak Mahindra Asset Management Company Limited.
Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P450% of 10944% of 10987% of 109100% of 24
Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P50.84% points1.36% points0.86% points1.62% points
Portfolio turned over a year P166%80%52%not measured
Run by P7Sailesh Raj Bhan · 21 yrsnot knownRupesh Patel · 3.6 yrsnot known
1-year return−1.4%6.9%7.0%4.2%
3 years p.a.13.5%17.1%18.6%17.3%
5 years p.a.16.4%13.5%18.0%—
Deepest fall (max drawdown)−18.6%−19.5%−19.9%−21.0%
Assets (AUM)₹53,760 Cr₹32,454 Cr₹48,143 Cr₹25,937 Cr
Disclosed history14 yrs5.9 yrs14 yrs—
Holdings · top ten weight123 · 29%91 · 30%105 · 25%none disclosed

Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — a category error is the first thing the postulates refuse to make. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.