ANVESHAN Create account

Compare

Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is Σ min(weight) over the stocks both hold, from the latest disclosures. All 6,937 schemes are searchable — by scheme name, by fund house, or by the category you know them as.

4 of 6 chosen

  • Nippon India Multi Cap FundMulti Cap×
  • Bandhan Value FundValue×
  • Kotak Mid Cap FundMid Cap · no portfolio disclosed×
  • Kotak Multi Cap FundMulti Cap · no portfolio disclosed×

Overlap

share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common

each fundagainst each otherNippon India Multi CapBandhan ValueKotak Mid CapKotak Multi Cap
Nippon India Multi CapMulti Cap
itself
Nippon India Multi Cap and Bandhan Value share 31% of their portfolios
Nippon India Multi Cap and Kotak Mid Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Mid Cap
Nippon India Multi Cap and Kotak Multi Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Multi Cap
Bandhan ValueValue
Bandhan Value and Nippon India Multi Cap share 31% of their portfolios
itself
Bandhan Value and Kotak Mid Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Mid Cap
Bandhan Value and Kotak Multi Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Multi Cap
Kotak Mid CapMid Cap
Kotak Mid Cap and Nippon India Multi Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Mid Cap
Kotak Mid Cap and Bandhan Value: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Mid Cap
itself
Kotak Mid Cap and Kotak Multi Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Mid Cap
Kotak Multi CapMulti Cap
Kotak Multi Cap and Nippon India Multi Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Multi Cap
Kotak Multi Cap and Bandhan Value: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Multi Cap
Kotak Multi Cap and Kotak Mid Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Multi Cap
itself

Closest pair: Nippon India Multi Cap Fund and Bandhan Value Fund share 31% of their portfolios. Most of what each of them holds, the other does not; whether two funds this far apart belong in one portfolio is a separate question.

2 of these funds have no portfolio on file, so their rows are blank rather than zero — an absence in our data, not a finding about the funds.

Read a cell as: of everything the two funds hold, this much is the same holding at the same weight. It is symmetric — the pair above the diagonal and the pair below it are one number shown twice. A pair at 0% holds nothing in common, which is a real answer, and often the useful one.

Side by side

record, cost, returns, drawdown, size

MeasureNippon India Multi CapBandhan ValueKotak Mid CapKotak Multi Cap
CategoryMulti CapValueMid CapMulti Cap
Fund houseNippon Life India Asset Management LimitedBandhan AMC LimitedKotak Mahindra Asset Management Company Limited.Kotak Mahindra Asset Management Company Limited.
Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P450% of 10967% of 10983% of 109100% of 24
Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P50.84% points1.17% points1.44% points1.62% points
Portfolio turned over a year P166%68%not measurednot measured
Run by P7Sailesh Raj Bhan · 21 yrsDaylynn Pinto · ≥ 3.5 yrsnot knownnot known
1-year return−1.4%−1.1%4.8%4.2%
3 years p.a.13.5%10.4%18.1%17.3%
5 years p.a.16.4%12.8%16.8%—
Deepest fall (max drawdown)−18.6%−17.9%−20.9%−21.0%
Assets (AUM)₹53,760 Cr₹10,051 Cr₹64,136 Cr₹25,937 Cr
Disclosed history14 yrs4.9 yrs——
Holdings · top ten weight123 · 29%68 · 47%none disclosednone disclosed

Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — a category error is the first thing the postulates refuse to make. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.