Compare
Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is Σ min(weight) over the stocks both hold, from the latest disclosures. All 6,937 schemes are searchable — by scheme name, by fund house, or by the category you know them as.
5 of 6 chosen
Add another Multi Cap fund — overlap says most about funds of one kind:
Overlap
share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common
| each fundagainst each other | Nippon India Multi Cap | ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) | ICICI Prudential Multi Cap | Axis Multicap | Mahindra Manulife Multi Cap |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nippon India Multi CapMulti Cap | itself | Nippon India Multi Cap and ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) share 29% of their portfolios | Nippon India Multi Cap and ICICI Prudential Multi Cap share 15% of their portfolios | Nippon India Multi Cap and Axis Multicap share 32% of their portfolios | Nippon India Multi Cap and Mahindra Manulife Multi Cap share 17% of their portfolios |
| ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund)Value | ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) and Nippon India Multi Cap share 29% of their portfolios | itself | ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) and ICICI Prudential Multi Cap share 5% of their portfolios | ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) and Axis Multicap share 18% of their portfolios | ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) and Mahindra Manulife Multi Cap share 14% of their portfolios |
| ICICI Prudential Multi CapMulti Cap | ICICI Prudential Multi Cap and Nippon India Multi Cap share 15% of their portfolios | ICICI Prudential Multi Cap and ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) share 5% of their portfolios | itself | ICICI Prudential Multi Cap and Axis Multicap share 23% of their portfolios | ICICI Prudential Multi Cap and Mahindra Manulife Multi Cap share 16% of their portfolios |
| Axis MulticapMulti Cap | Axis Multicap and Nippon India Multi Cap share 32% of their portfolios | Axis Multicap and ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) share 18% of their portfolios | Axis Multicap and ICICI Prudential Multi Cap share 23% of their portfolios | itself | Axis Multicap and Mahindra Manulife Multi Cap share 25% of their portfolios |
| Mahindra Manulife Multi CapMulti Cap | Mahindra Manulife Multi Cap and Nippon India Multi Cap share 17% of their portfolios | Mahindra Manulife Multi Cap and ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) share 14% of their portfolios | Mahindra Manulife Multi Cap and ICICI Prudential Multi Cap share 16% of their portfolios | Mahindra Manulife Multi Cap and Axis Multicap share 25% of their portfolios | itself |
Closest pair: Nippon India Multi Cap Fund and Axis Multicap Fund share 32% of their portfolios. Most of what each of them holds, the other does not; whether two funds this far apart belong in one portfolio is a separate question.
Read a cell as: of everything the two funds hold, this much is the same holding at the same weight. It is symmetric — the pair above the diagonal and the pair below it are one number shown twice. A pair at 0% holds nothing in common, which is a real answer, and often the useful one.
Side by side
record, cost, returns, drawdown, size
| Measure | Nippon India Multi Cap | ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) | ICICI Prudential Multi Cap | Axis Multicap | Mahindra Manulife Multi Cap |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Category | Multi Cap | Value | Multi Cap | Multi Cap | Multi Cap |
| Fund house | Nippon Life India Asset Management Limited | ICICI Prudential Asset Management Company Limited | ICICI Prudential Asset Management Company Limited | Axis Asset Management Co. Ltd. | Mahindra Manulife Investment Management Pvt Ltd |
| Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P4 | 50% of 109 | 68% of 109 | 49% of 109 | 100% of 22 | 99% of 77 |
| Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P5 | 0.84% points | 0.83% points | 1.03% points | 1.45% points | 2.04% points |
| Portfolio turned over a year P1 | 66% | 58% | 108% | 96% | 151% |
| Run by P7 | Sailesh Raj Bhan · 21 yrs | Dharmesh Kakkad · 5.7 yrs | Lalit Kumar · 1.1 yrs | not known | Vishal Jajoo · 10 mo |
| 1-year return | −1.4% | −5.4% | 6.8% | 9.8% | 12.5% |
| 3 years p.a. | 13.5% | 11.5% | 15.9% | 20.0% | 17.9% |
| 5 years p.a. | 16.4% | 13.5% | 15.0% | — | 16.0% |
| Deepest fall (max drawdown) | −18.6% | −14.0% | −17.3% | −18.1% | −20.2% |
| Assets (AUM) | ₹53,760 Cr | ₹60,800 Cr | ₹19,305 Cr | ₹9,775 Cr | ₹7,471 Cr |
| Disclosed history | 14 yrs | 13 yrs | 11 yrs | 5.2 yrs | 9.4 yrs |
| Holdings · top ten weight | 123 · 29% | 66 · 52% | 167 · 24% | 114 · 23% | 73 · 38% |
Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — a category error is the first thing the postulates refuse to make. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.