Compare
Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is Σ min(weight) over the stocks both hold, from the latest disclosures. All 6,937 schemes are searchable — by scheme name, by fund house, or by the category you know them as.
4 of 6 chosen
Add another Multi Cap fund — overlap says most about funds of one kind:
Overlap
share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common
| each fundagainst each other | Nippon India Multi Cap | Tata Value | SBI MIDCAP | ICICI Prudential Multi Cap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nippon India Multi CapMulti Cap | itself | Nippon India Multi Cap and Tata Value share 13% of their portfolios | Nippon India Multi Cap and SBI MIDCAP share 9% of their portfolios | Nippon India Multi Cap and ICICI Prudential Multi Cap share 15% of their portfolios |
| Tata ValueValue | Tata Value and Nippon India Multi Cap share 13% of their portfolios | itself | Tata Value and SBI MIDCAP share 5% of their portfolios | Tata Value and ICICI Prudential Multi Cap share 9% of their portfolios |
| SBI MIDCAPMid Cap | SBI MIDCAP and Nippon India Multi Cap share 9% of their portfolios | SBI MIDCAP and Tata Value share 5% of their portfolios | itself | SBI MIDCAP and ICICI Prudential Multi Cap share 12% of their portfolios |
| ICICI Prudential Multi CapMulti Cap | ICICI Prudential Multi Cap and Nippon India Multi Cap share 15% of their portfolios | ICICI Prudential Multi Cap and Tata Value share 9% of their portfolios | ICICI Prudential Multi Cap and SBI MIDCAP share 12% of their portfolios | itself |
Closest pair: Nippon India Multi Cap Fund and ICICI Prudential Multi Cap Fund share 15% of their portfolios. Most of what each of them holds, the other does not; whether two funds this far apart belong in one portfolio is a separate question.
Read a cell as: of everything the two funds hold, this much is the same holding at the same weight. It is symmetric — the pair above the diagonal and the pair below it are one number shown twice. A pair at 0% holds nothing in common, which is a real answer, and often the useful one.
Side by side
record, cost, returns, drawdown, size
| Measure | Nippon India Multi Cap | Tata Value | SBI MIDCAP | ICICI Prudential Multi Cap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Category | Multi Cap | Value | Mid Cap | Multi Cap |
| Fund house | Nippon Life India Asset Management Limited | Tata Asset Management Limited | SBI Funds Management Limited | ICICI Prudential Asset Management Company Limited |
| Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P4 | 50% of 109 | 63% of 109 | 38% of 109 | 49% of 109 |
| Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P5 | 0.84% points | 1.15% points | 1.09% points | 1.03% points |
| Portfolio turned over a year P1 | 66% | 81% | 80% | 108% |
| Run by P7 | Sailesh Raj Bhan · 21 yrs | Sonam Udasi · ≥ 9 mo | Bhavin Vithlani · ≥ 3 mo | Lalit Kumar · 1.1 yrs |
| 1-year return | −1.4% | 0.2% | 3.8% | 6.8% |
| 3 years p.a. | 13.5% | 12.9% | 11.0% | 15.9% |
| 5 years p.a. | 16.4% | 13.3% | 13.5% | 15.0% |
| Deepest fall (max drawdown) | −18.6% | −20.9% | −17.9% | −17.3% |
| Assets (AUM) | ₹53,760 Cr | ₹8,440 Cr | ₹24,349 Cr | ₹19,305 Cr |
| Disclosed history | 14 yrs | 11 yrs | 5.8 yrs | 11 yrs |
| Holdings · top ten weight | 123 · 29% | 41 · 52% | 64 · 28% | 167 · 24% |
Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — a category error is the first thing the postulates refuse to make. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.