Compare
Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is Σ min(weight) over the stocks both hold, from the latest disclosures.
Overlap
share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common
| Nippon India Multi Cap | ICICI Prudential Multi Cap | |
|---|---|---|
| Nippon India Multi Cap | itself | 15% |
| ICICI Prudential Multi Cap | 15% | itself |
Most alike: Nippon India Multi Cap Fund and ICICI Prudential Multi Cap Fund share 15% of their portfolios. Two funds this different are doing different things; whether that is what you want is a separate question.
Side by side
record, cost, returns, drawdown, size
| Measure | Nippon India Multi Cap | ICICI Prudential Multi Cap |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Multi Cap | Multi Cap |
| Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P4 | 50% of 109 | 49% of 109 |
| Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P5 | 0.84% | 1.03% |
| Portfolio turned over a year P1 | 66% | 108% |
| Run by P7 | Sailesh Raj Bhan · 21 yrs | Lalit Kumar · 1.1 yrs |
| 1-year return | −1.4% | 6.8% |
| 3 years p.a. | 13.5% | 15.9% |
| 5 years p.a. | 16.4% | 15.0% |
| Deepest fall (max drawdown) | −18.6% | −17.3% |
| Assets (AUM) | ₹53,760 Cr | ₹19,305 Cr |
| Disclosed history | 14 yrs | 11 yrs |
| Holdings · top ten weight | 123 · 29% | 167 · 24% |
Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — a category error is the first thing the postulates refuse to make. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.