ANVESHAN Create account

Compare

Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is Σ min(weight) over the stocks both hold, from the latest disclosures. All 6,937 schemes are searchable — by scheme name, by fund house, or by the category you know them as.

3 of 6 chosen

  • Quant Multi Asset Allocation FundMulti Asset Allocation×
  • Nippon India Multi Asset Allocation FundMulti Asset Allocation×
  • Kotak Multi Asset Allocation FundMulti Asset Allocation · no portfolio disclosed×

Overlap

share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common

each fundagainst each otherQuant Multi Asset AllocationNippon India Multi Asset AllocationKotak Multi Asset Allocation
Quant Multi Asset AllocationMulti Asset Allocation
itself
Quant Multi Asset Allocation and Nippon India Multi Asset Allocation share 21% of their portfolios
Quant Multi Asset Allocation and Kotak Multi Asset Allocation: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Multi Asset Allocation
Nippon India Multi Asset AllocationMulti Asset Allocation
Nippon India Multi Asset Allocation and Quant Multi Asset Allocation share 21% of their portfolios
itself
Nippon India Multi Asset Allocation and Kotak Multi Asset Allocation: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Multi Asset Allocation
Kotak Multi Asset AllocationMulti Asset Allocation
Kotak Multi Asset Allocation and Quant Multi Asset Allocation: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Multi Asset Allocation
Kotak Multi Asset Allocation and Nippon India Multi Asset Allocation: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Multi Asset Allocation
itself

Closest pair: Quant Multi Asset Allocation Fund and Nippon India Multi Asset Allocation Fund share 21% of their portfolios. Most of what each of them holds, the other does not; whether two funds this far apart belong in one portfolio is a separate question.

Kotak Multi Asset Allocation has no portfolio on file, so its row is blank rather than zero — that is an absence in our data, not a finding about the fund.

Read a cell as: of everything the two funds hold, this much is the same holding at the same weight. It is symmetric — the pair above the diagonal and the pair below it are one number shown twice. A pair at 0% holds nothing in common, which is a real answer, and often the useful one.

Side by side

record, cost, returns, drawdown, size

MeasureQuant Multi Asset AllocationNippon India Multi Asset AllocationKotak Multi Asset Allocation
CategoryMulti Asset AllocationMulti Asset AllocationMulti Asset Allocation
Fund housequant Money Managers LimitedNippon Life India Asset Management LimitedKotak Mahindra Asset Management Company Limited.
Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P4100% of 4376% of 38not measured
Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P50.82% points1.53% points1.55% points
Portfolio turned over a year P1135%53%not measured
Run by P7Ankit Pande · ≥ 2.4 yrsKinjal Desai · 6.0 yrsnot known
1-year return15.8%11.5%14.7%
3 years p.a.22.6%19.4%18.4%
5 years p.a.19.6%15.8%—
Deepest fall (max drawdown)−12.5%−10.8%−13.8%
Assets (AUM)₹6,356 Cr₹15,774 Cr₹13,629 Cr
Disclosed history6.9 yrs6.1 yrs—
Holdings · top ten weight68 · 78%172 · 34%none disclosed

Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — a category error is the first thing the postulates refuse to make. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.