Compare
Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is Σ min(weight) over the stocks both hold, from the latest disclosures.
Overlap
share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common
| UTI ELSS Tax Saver | Mirae Asset ELSS Tax Saver | |
|---|---|---|
| UTI ELSS Tax Saver | itself | 37% |
| Mirae Asset ELSS Tax Saver | 37% | itself |
Most alike: UTI ELSS Tax Saver Fund and Mirae Asset ELSS Tax Saver Fund share 37% of their portfolios. Two funds this different are doing different things; whether that is what you want is a separate question.
Side by side
record, cost, returns, drawdown, size
| Measure | UTI ELSS Tax Saver | Mirae Asset ELSS Tax Saver |
|---|---|---|
| Category | ELSS | ELSS |
| Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P4 | 34% of 109 | 76% of 94 |
| Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P5 | 1.06% | 1.46% |
| Portfolio turned over a year P1 | 49% | 87% |
| Run by P7 | Amit Premchandani · 1.3 yrs | Neelesh Surana · 11 yrs |
| 1-year return | −4.6% | 1.1% |
| 3 years p.a. | 8.3% | 12.4% |
| 5 years p.a. | 7.4% | 11.0% |
| Deepest fall (max drawdown) | −18.6% | −17.1% |
| Assets (AUM) | ₹3,505 Cr | ₹26,252 Cr |
| Disclosed history | 11 yrs | 5.1 yrs |
| Holdings · top ten weight | 61 · 40% | 71 · 41% |
Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — a category error is the first thing the postulates refuse to make. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.