Compare
Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is Σ min(weight) over the stocks both hold, from the latest disclosures.
Overlap
share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common
| Sahara Midcap | UTI Bluechip Flexicap | |
|---|---|---|
| Sahara Midcap | itself | 0% |
| UTI Bluechip Flexicap | 0% | itself |
Most alike: Sahara Midcap Fund and UTI Bluechip Flexicap Fund share 0% of their portfolios. Two funds this different are doing different things; whether that is what you want is a separate question.
Side by side
record, cost, returns, drawdown, size
| Measure | Sahara Midcap | UTI Bluechip Flexicap |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Growth | Growth |
| Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P4 | 97% of 32 | not measured |
| Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P5 | 1.32% points | not measured |
| Portfolio turned over a year P1 | not measured | 35% |
| Run by P7 | not known | not known |
| 1-year return | −22.0% | — |
| 3 years p.a. | −4.6% | — |
| 5 years p.a. | 4.5% | — |
| Deepest fall (max drawdown) | not computed | not computed |
| Assets (AUM) | ₹0 Cr | ₹2,501 Cr |
| Disclosed history | — | 2.3 yrs |
| Holdings · top ten weight | — · — | 57 · 42% |
Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — a category error is the first thing the postulates refuse to make. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.