Compare
Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is Σ min(weight) over the stocks both hold, from the latest disclosures.
Overlap
share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common
| UTI - Large Cap | Nippon India Large Cap | |
|---|---|---|
| UTI - Large Cap | itself | 58% |
| Nippon India Large Cap | 58% | itself |
Most alike: UTI - Large Cap Fund and Nippon India Large Cap Fund share 58% of their portfolios. Holding both is closer to holding one twice than to diversifying.
Side by side
record, cost, returns, drawdown, size
| Measure | UTI - Large Cap | Nippon India Large Cap |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Large Cap | Large Cap |
| Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P4 | 38% of 109 | 73% of 109 |
| Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P5 | 0.87% | 1.01% |
| Portfolio turned over a year P1 | 64% | 57% |
| Run by P7 | Karthikraj Lakshmanan · 4.0 yrs | Sailesh Raj Bhan · 19 yrs |
| 1-year return | −5.4% | −4.7% |
| 3 years p.a. | 7.5% | 11.1% |
| 5 years p.a. | 6.8% | 12.8% |
| Deepest fall (max drawdown) | −15.9% | −15.4% |
| Assets (AUM) | ₹12,140 Cr | ₹52,344 Cr |
| Disclosed history | 12 yrs | 13 yrs |
| Holdings · top ten weight | 70 · 49% | 69 · 45% |
Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — a category error is the first thing the postulates refuse to make. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.