Compare
Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is Σ min(weight) over the stocks both hold, from the latest disclosures. All 6,937 schemes are searchable — by scheme name, by fund house, or by the category you know them as.
3 of 6 chosen
Add another Multi Cap fund — overlap says most about funds of one kind:
Overlap
share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common
| each fundagainst each other | Quant Multi Cap | SBI MultiCap | Nippon India Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Quant Multi CapMulti Cap | itself | Quant Multi Cap and SBI MultiCap share 13% of their portfolios | Quant Multi Cap and Nippon India Value share 7% of their portfolios |
| SBI MultiCapMulti Cap | SBI MultiCap and Quant Multi Cap share 13% of their portfolios | itself | SBI MultiCap and Nippon India Value share 19% of their portfolios |
| Nippon India ValueValue | Nippon India Value and Quant Multi Cap share 7% of their portfolios | Nippon India Value and SBI MultiCap share 19% of their portfolios | itself |
Closest pair: SBI MultiCap Fund and Nippon India Value Fund share 19% of their portfolios. Most of what each of them holds, the other does not; whether two funds this far apart belong in one portfolio is a separate question.
Read a cell as: of everything the two funds hold, this much is the same holding at the same weight. It is symmetric — the pair above the diagonal and the pair below it are one number shown twice. A pair at 0% holds nothing in common, which is a real answer, and often the useful one.
Side by side
record, cost, returns, drawdown, size
| Measure | Quant Multi Cap | SBI MultiCap | Nippon India Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Category | Multi Cap | Multi Cap | Value |
| Fund house | quant Money Managers Limited | SBI Funds Management Limited | Nippon Life India Asset Management Limited |
| Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P4 | 73% of 109 | 0% of 19 | 93% of 109 |
| Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P5 | 0.93% points | 1.00% points | 0.82% points |
| Portfolio turned over a year P1 | 88% | 85% | 82% |
| Run by P7 | Ankit Pande · ≥ 2.5 yrs | Bectors Food · ≥ 3 mo | Meenakshi Dawar · 8.3 yrs |
| 1-year return | 4.9% | −0.6% | −2.8% |
| 3 years p.a. | 10.5% | 13.3% | 14.0% |
| 5 years p.a. | 11.7% | — | 13.4% |
| Deepest fall (max drawdown) | −25.3% | −15.1% | −17.6% |
| Assets (AUM) | ₹7,717 Cr | ₹24,138 Cr | ₹8,875 Cr |
| Disclosed history | 6.9 yrs | 3.7 yrs | 12 yrs |
| Holdings · top ten weight | 74 · 53% | 72 · 30% | 94 · 36% |
Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — a category error is the first thing the postulates refuse to make. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.