Compare
Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is Σ min(weight) over the stocks both hold, from the latest disclosures. All 6,937 schemes are searchable — by scheme name, by fund house, or by the category you know them as.
3 of 6 chosen
Add another Multi Cap fund — overlap says most about funds of one kind:
Overlap
share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common
| each fundagainst each other | Quant Multi Cap | Parag Parikh Flexi Cap | ICICI Prudential Multi Cap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Quant Multi CapMulti Cap | itself | Quant Multi Cap and Parag Parikh Flexi Cap share 10% of their portfolios | Quant Multi Cap and ICICI Prudential Multi Cap share 7% of their portfolios |
| Parag Parikh Flexi CapFlexi Cap | Parag Parikh Flexi Cap and Quant Multi Cap share 10% of their portfolios | itself | Parag Parikh Flexi Cap and ICICI Prudential Multi Cap share 2% of their portfolios |
| ICICI Prudential Multi CapMulti Cap | ICICI Prudential Multi Cap and Quant Multi Cap share 7% of their portfolios | ICICI Prudential Multi Cap and Parag Parikh Flexi Cap share 2% of their portfolios | itself |
No two of these hold much of the same portfolio. The closest pair, Quant Multi Cap Fund and Parag Parikh Flexi Cap Fund, share 10%. That is a number, not a resemblance: at this level the two funds are doing separate things, and nothing here says whether that is what you wanted.
Read a cell as: of everything the two funds hold, this much is the same holding at the same weight. It is symmetric — the pair above the diagonal and the pair below it are one number shown twice. A pair at 0% holds nothing in common, which is a real answer, and often the useful one.
Side by side
record, cost, returns, drawdown, size
| Measure | Quant Multi Cap | Parag Parikh Flexi Cap | ICICI Prudential Multi Cap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Category | Multi Cap | Flexi Cap | Multi Cap |
| Fund house | quant Money Managers Limited | PPFAS Asset Management Pvt. Ltd. | ICICI Prudential Asset Management Company Limited |
| Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P4 | 73% of 109 | 91% of 109 | 49% of 109 |
| Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P5 | 0.93% points | 0.84% points | 1.03% points |
| Portfolio turned over a year P1 | 88% | 29% | 108% |
| Run by P7 | Ankit Pande · ≥ 2.5 yrs | Rajeev Thakkar · 13 yrs | Lalit Kumar · 1.1 yrs |
| 1-year return | 4.9% | −5.1% | 6.8% |
| 3 years p.a. | 10.5% | 12.8% | 15.9% |
| 5 years p.a. | 11.7% | 11.5% | 15.0% |
| Deepest fall (max drawdown) | −25.3% | −11.0% | −17.3% |
| Assets (AUM) | ₹7,717 Cr | ₹1.46 lakh Cr | ₹19,305 Cr |
| Disclosed history | 6.9 yrs | 5.0 yrs | 11 yrs |
| Holdings · top ten weight | 74 · 53% | 116 · 52% | 167 · 24% |
Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — a category error is the first thing the postulates refuse to make. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.