Compare
Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is Σ min(weight) over the stocks both hold, from the latest disclosures. All 6,937 schemes are searchable — by scheme name, by fund house, or by the category you know them as.
4 of 6 chosen
Add another Multi Cap fund — overlap says most about funds of one kind:
Overlap
share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common
| each fundagainst each other | Quant Multi Cap | SBI MIDCAP | Motilal Oswal Midcap | Nippon India Multi Cap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Quant Multi CapMulti Cap | itself | Quant Multi Cap and SBI MIDCAP share 8% of their portfolios | Quant Multi Cap and Motilal Oswal Midcap share 4% of their portfolios | Quant Multi Cap and Nippon India Multi Cap share 7% of their portfolios |
| SBI MIDCAPMid Cap | SBI MIDCAP and Quant Multi Cap share 8% of their portfolios | itself | SBI MIDCAP and Motilal Oswal Midcap share 5% of their portfolios | SBI MIDCAP and Nippon India Multi Cap share 9% of their portfolios |
| Motilal Oswal MidcapMid Cap | Motilal Oswal Midcap and Quant Multi Cap share 4% of their portfolios | Motilal Oswal Midcap and SBI MIDCAP share 5% of their portfolios | itself | Motilal Oswal Midcap and Nippon India Multi Cap share 7% of their portfolios |
| Nippon India Multi CapMulti Cap | Nippon India Multi Cap and Quant Multi Cap share 7% of their portfolios | Nippon India Multi Cap and SBI MIDCAP share 9% of their portfolios | Nippon India Multi Cap and Motilal Oswal Midcap share 7% of their portfolios | itself |
No two of these hold much of the same portfolio. The closest pair, SBI MIDCAP FUND and Nippon India Multi Cap Fund, share 9%. That is a number, not a resemblance: at this level the two funds are doing separate things, and nothing here says whether that is what you wanted.
Read a cell as: of everything the two funds hold, this much is the same holding at the same weight. It is symmetric — the pair above the diagonal and the pair below it are one number shown twice. A pair at 0% holds nothing in common, which is a real answer, and often the useful one.
Side by side
record, cost, returns, drawdown, size
| Measure | Quant Multi Cap | SBI MIDCAP | Motilal Oswal Midcap | Nippon India Multi Cap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Category | Multi Cap | Mid Cap | Mid Cap | Multi Cap |
| Fund house | quant Money Managers Limited | SBI Funds Management Limited | Motilal Oswal Asset Management Company Limited | Nippon Life India Asset Management Limited |
| Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P4 | 73% of 109 | 38% of 109 | 54% of 109 | 50% of 109 |
| Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P5 | 0.93% points | 1.09% points | 1.37% points | 0.84% points |
| Portfolio turned over a year P1 | 88% | 80% | 92% | 66% |
| Run by P7 | Ankit Pande · ≥ 2.5 yrs | Bhavin Vithlani · ≥ 3 mo | Rakesh Shetty · 3.8 yrs | Sailesh Raj Bhan · 21 yrs |
| 1-year return | 4.9% | 3.8% | −0.5% | −1.4% |
| 3 years p.a. | 10.5% | 11.0% | 19.5% | 13.5% |
| 5 years p.a. | 11.7% | 13.5% | 21.1% | 16.4% |
| Deepest fall (max drawdown) | −25.3% | −17.9% | −28.9% | −18.6% |
| Assets (AUM) | ₹7,717 Cr | ₹24,349 Cr | ₹41,706 Cr | ₹53,760 Cr |
| Disclosed history | 6.9 yrs | 5.8 yrs | 4.0 yrs | 14 yrs |
| Holdings · top ten weight | 74 · 53% | 64 · 28% | 32 · 54% | 123 · 29% |
Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — a category error is the first thing the postulates refuse to make. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.