Compare
Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is Σ min(weight) over the stocks both hold, from the latest disclosures. All 6,937 schemes are searchable — by scheme name, by fund house, or by the category you know them as.
4 of 6 chosen
Add another Multi Cap fund — overlap says most about funds of one kind:
Overlap
share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common
| each fundagainst each other | Quant Multi Cap | Nippon India Growth Mid Cap | Kotak Mid Cap | SBI MultiCap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Quant Multi CapMulti Cap | itself | Quant Multi Cap and Nippon India Growth Mid Cap share 4% of their portfolios | Quant Multi Cap and Kotak Mid Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Mid Cap | Quant Multi Cap and SBI MultiCap share 13% of their portfolios |
| Nippon India Growth Mid CapMid Cap | Nippon India Growth Mid Cap and Quant Multi Cap share 4% of their portfolios | itself | Nippon India Growth Mid Cap and Kotak Mid Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Mid Cap | Nippon India Growth Mid Cap and SBI MultiCap share 15% of their portfolios |
| Kotak Mid CapMid Cap | Kotak Mid Cap and Quant Multi Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Mid Cap | Kotak Mid Cap and Nippon India Growth Mid Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Mid Cap | itself | Kotak Mid Cap and SBI MultiCap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Mid Cap |
| SBI MultiCapMulti Cap | SBI MultiCap and Quant Multi Cap share 13% of their portfolios | SBI MultiCap and Nippon India Growth Mid Cap share 15% of their portfolios | SBI MultiCap and Kotak Mid Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Mid Cap | itself |
Closest pair: Nippon India Growth Mid Cap Fund and SBI MultiCap Fund share 15% of their portfolios. Most of what each of them holds, the other does not; whether two funds this far apart belong in one portfolio is a separate question.
Kotak Mid Cap has no portfolio on file, so its row is blank rather than zero — that is an absence in our data, not a finding about the fund.
Read a cell as: of everything the two funds hold, this much is the same holding at the same weight. It is symmetric — the pair above the diagonal and the pair below it are one number shown twice. A pair at 0% holds nothing in common, which is a real answer, and often the useful one.
Side by side
record, cost, returns, drawdown, size
| Measure | Quant Multi Cap | Nippon India Growth Mid Cap | Kotak Mid Cap | SBI MultiCap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Category | Multi Cap | Mid Cap | Mid Cap | Multi Cap |
| Fund house | quant Money Managers Limited | Nippon Life India Asset Management Limited | Kotak Mahindra Asset Management Company Limited. | SBI Funds Management Limited |
| Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P4 | 73% of 109 | 87% of 109 | 83% of 109 | 0% of 19 |
| Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P5 | 0.93% points | 0.86% points | 1.44% points | 1.00% points |
| Portfolio turned over a year P1 | 88% | 52% | not measured | 85% |
| Run by P7 | Ankit Pande · ≥ 2.5 yrs | Rupesh Patel · 3.6 yrs | not known | Bectors Food · ≥ 3 mo |
| 1-year return | 4.9% | 7.0% | 4.8% | −0.6% |
| 3 years p.a. | 10.5% | 18.6% | 18.1% | 13.3% |
| 5 years p.a. | 11.7% | 18.0% | 16.8% | — |
| Deepest fall (max drawdown) | −25.3% | −19.9% | −20.9% | −15.1% |
| Assets (AUM) | ₹7,717 Cr | ₹48,143 Cr | ₹64,136 Cr | ₹24,138 Cr |
| Disclosed history | 6.9 yrs | 14 yrs | — | 3.7 yrs |
| Holdings · top ten weight | 74 · 53% | 105 · 25% | none disclosed | 72 · 30% |
Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — a category error is the first thing the postulates refuse to make. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.