Compare
Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is Σ min(weight) over the stocks both hold, from the latest disclosures.
Overlap
share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common
| Nippon India Vision Large & Mid Cap | HDFC Large & Mid Cap | |
|---|---|---|
| Nippon India Vision Large & Mid Cap | itself | 38% |
| HDFC Large & Mid Cap | 38% | itself |
Most alike: Nippon India Vision Large & Mid Cap Fund and HDFC Large & Mid Cap Fund share 38% of their portfolios. Two funds this different are doing different things; whether that is what you want is a separate question.
Side by side
record, cost, returns, drawdown, size
| Measure | Nippon India Vision Large & Mid Cap | HDFC Large & Mid Cap |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Large & Mid Cap | Large & Mid Cap |
| Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P4 | 32% of 109 | 44% of 109 |
| Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P5 | 0.65% | 0.51% |
| Portfolio turned over a year P1 | 130% | 39% |
| Run by P7 | Aishwarya Deepak Agarwal · 5.2 yrs | not known |
| 1-year return | −0.8% | 0.4% |
| 3 years p.a. | 14.8% | 13.1% |
| 5 years p.a. | 12.9% | 14.2% |
| Deepest fall (max drawdown) | −16.8% | −18.7% |
| Assets (AUM) | ₹7,329 Cr | ₹30,372 Cr |
| Disclosed history | 14 yrs | 2.3 yrs |
| Holdings · top ten weight | 84 · 34% | 243 · 20% |
Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — a category error is the first thing the postulates refuse to make. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.