ANVESHAN Create account

Compare

Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is Σ min(weight) over the stocks both hold, from the latest disclosures. All 6,937 schemes are searchable — by scheme name, by fund house, or by the category you know them as.

4 of 6 chosen

  • Nippon India Growth Mid Cap FundMid Cap×
  • Axis Large Cap FundLarge Cap×
  • SBI Large Cap FundLarge Cap×
  • Kotak Mid Cap FundMid Cap · no portfolio disclosed×

Overlap

share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common

each fundagainst each otherNippon India Growth Mid CapAxis Large CapSBI Large CapKotak Mid Cap
Nippon India Growth Mid CapMid Cap
itself
Nippon India Growth Mid Cap and Axis Large Cap share 11% of their portfolios
Nippon India Growth Mid Cap and SBI Large Cap share 13% of their portfolios
Nippon India Growth Mid Cap and Kotak Mid Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Mid Cap
Axis Large CapLarge Cap
Axis Large Cap and Nippon India Growth Mid Cap share 11% of their portfolios
itself
Axis Large Cap and SBI Large Cap share 50% of their portfolios
Axis Large Cap and Kotak Mid Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Mid Cap
SBI Large CapLarge Cap
SBI Large Cap and Nippon India Growth Mid Cap share 13% of their portfolios
SBI Large Cap and Axis Large Cap share 50% of their portfolios
itself
SBI Large Cap and Kotak Mid Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Mid Cap
Kotak Mid CapMid Cap
Kotak Mid Cap and Nippon India Growth Mid Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Mid Cap
Kotak Mid Cap and Axis Large Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Mid Cap
Kotak Mid Cap and SBI Large Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Mid Cap
itself

Closest pair: Axis Large Cap Fund and SBI Large Cap Fund share 50% of their portfolios. Holding both is closer to holding one twice than to diversifying.

Kotak Mid Cap has no portfolio on file, so its row is blank rather than zero — that is an absence in our data, not a finding about the fund.

Read a cell as: of everything the two funds hold, this much is the same holding at the same weight. It is symmetric — the pair above the diagonal and the pair below it are one number shown twice. A pair at 0% holds nothing in common, which is a real answer, and often the useful one.

Side by side

record, cost, returns, drawdown, size

MeasureNippon India Growth Mid CapAxis Large CapSBI Large CapKotak Mid Cap
CategoryMid CapLarge CapLarge CapMid Cap
Fund houseNippon Life India Asset Management LimitedAxis Asset Management Co. Ltd.SBI Funds Management LimitedKotak Mahindra Asset Management Company Limited.
Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P487% of 10947% of 10945% of 10983% of 109
Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P50.86% points1.21% points0.93% points1.44% points
Portfolio turned over a year P152%73%59%not measured
Run by P7Rupesh Patel · 3.6 yrsnot knownSaurabh Pant · ≥ 3 monot known
1-year return7.0%−3.2%−1.6%4.8%
3 years p.a.18.6%9.2%9.2%18.1%
5 years p.a.18.0%5.8%9.0%16.8%
Deepest fall (max drawdown)−19.9%−15.5%−15.4%−20.9%
Assets (AUM)₹48,143 Cr₹30,395 Cr₹55,417 Cr₹64,136 Cr
Disclosed history14 yrs5.9 yrs5.8 yrs—
Holdings · top ten weight105 · 25%49 · 48%57 · 47%none disclosed

Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — a category error is the first thing the postulates refuse to make. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.