Compare
Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is Σ min(weight) over the stocks both hold, from the latest disclosures.
Overlap
share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common
| Nippon India Growth Mid Cap | HDFC Mid Cap | |
|---|---|---|
| Nippon India Growth Mid Cap | itself | 31% |
| HDFC Mid Cap | 31% | itself |
Most alike: Nippon India Growth Mid Cap Fund and HDFC Mid Cap Fund share 31% of their portfolios. Two funds this different are doing different things; whether that is what you want is a separate question.
Side by side
record, cost, returns, drawdown, size
| Measure | Nippon India Growth Mid Cap | HDFC Mid Cap |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Mid Cap | Mid Cap |
| Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P4 | 87% of 109 | 66% of 109 |
| Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P5 | 0.86% | 0.92% |
| Portfolio turned over a year P1 | 52% | 38% |
| Run by P7 | Rupesh Patel · 3.6 yrs | not known |
| 1-year return | 7.0% | 6.6% |
| 3 years p.a. | 18.6% | 17.6% |
| 5 years p.a. | 18.0% | 18.9% |
| Deepest fall (max drawdown) | −19.9% | −16.8% |
| Assets (AUM) | ₹48,143 Cr | ₹1.07 lakh Cr |
| Disclosed history | 14 yrs | 10 mo |
| Holdings · top ten weight | 105 · 25% | 81 · 37% |
Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — a category error is the first thing the postulates refuse to make. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.