ANVESHAN Create account

Compare

Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is Σ min(weight) over the stocks both hold, from the latest disclosures. All 6,937 schemes are searchable — by scheme name, by fund house, or by the category you know them as.

4 of 6 chosen

  • Nippon India Growth Mid Cap FundMid Cap×
  • Kotak Mid Cap FundMid Cap · no portfolio disclosed×
  • HDFC Flexi Cap FundFlexi Cap×
  • HDFC Mid Cap FundMid Cap×

Overlap

share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common

each fundagainst each otherNippon India Growth Mid CapKotak Mid CapHDFC Flexi CapHDFC Mid Cap
Nippon India Growth Mid CapMid Cap
itself
Nippon India Growth Mid Cap and Kotak Mid Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Mid Cap
Nippon India Growth Mid Cap and HDFC Flexi Cap share 13% of their portfolios
Nippon India Growth Mid Cap and HDFC Mid Cap share 31% of their portfolios
Kotak Mid CapMid Cap
Kotak Mid Cap and Nippon India Growth Mid Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Mid Cap
itself
Kotak Mid Cap and HDFC Flexi Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Mid Cap
Kotak Mid Cap and HDFC Mid Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Mid Cap
HDFC Flexi CapFlexi Cap
HDFC Flexi Cap and Nippon India Growth Mid Cap share 13% of their portfolios
HDFC Flexi Cap and Kotak Mid Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Mid Cap
itself
HDFC Flexi Cap and HDFC Mid Cap share 10% of their portfolios
HDFC Mid CapMid Cap
HDFC Mid Cap and Nippon India Growth Mid Cap share 31% of their portfolios
HDFC Mid Cap and Kotak Mid Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Mid Cap
HDFC Mid Cap and HDFC Flexi Cap share 10% of their portfolios
itself

Closest pair: Nippon India Growth Mid Cap Fund and HDFC Mid Cap Fund share 31% of their portfolios. Most of what each of them holds, the other does not; whether two funds this far apart belong in one portfolio is a separate question.

Kotak Mid Cap has no portfolio on file, so its row is blank rather than zero — that is an absence in our data, not a finding about the fund.

Read a cell as: of everything the two funds hold, this much is the same holding at the same weight. It is symmetric — the pair above the diagonal and the pair below it are one number shown twice. A pair at 0% holds nothing in common, which is a real answer, and often the useful one.

Side by side

record, cost, returns, drawdown, size

MeasureNippon India Growth Mid CapKotak Mid CapHDFC Flexi CapHDFC Mid Cap
CategoryMid CapMid CapFlexi CapMid Cap
Fund houseNippon Life India Asset Management LimitedKotak Mahindra Asset Management Company Limited.HDFC Asset Management Company LimitedHDFC Asset Management Company Limited
Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P487% of 10983% of 10968% of 10966% of 109
Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P50.86% points1.44% points0.81% points0.92% points
Portfolio turned over a year P152%not measured48%38%
Run by P7Rupesh Patel · 3.6 yrsnot knownnot knownnot known
1-year return7.0%4.8%0.7%6.6%
3 years p.a.18.6%18.1%15.8%17.6%
5 years p.a.18.0%16.8%16.6%18.9%
Deepest fall (max drawdown)−19.9%−20.9%−13.3%−16.8%
Assets (AUM)₹48,143 Cr₹64,136 Cr₹1.13 lakh Cr₹1.07 lakh Cr
Disclosed history14 yrs—2.4 yrs10 mo
Holdings · top ten weight105 · 25%none disclosed86 · 44%81 · 37%

Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — a category error is the first thing the postulates refuse to make. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.