Compare
Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is Σ min(weight) over the stocks both hold, from the latest disclosures. All 6,937 schemes are searchable — by scheme name, by fund house, or by the category you know them as.
3 of 6 chosen
Add another Mid Cap fund — overlap says most about funds of one kind:
Overlap
share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common
| each fundagainst each other | Nippon India Growth Mid Cap | Aditya Birla Sun Life Flexi Cap | SBI FLEXICAP |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nippon India Growth Mid CapMid Cap | itself | Nippon India Growth Mid Cap and Aditya Birla Sun Life Flexi Cap share 20% of their portfolios | Nippon India Growth Mid Cap and SBI FLEXICAP share 18% of their portfolios |
| Aditya Birla Sun Life Flexi CapFlexi Cap | Aditya Birla Sun Life Flexi Cap and Nippon India Growth Mid Cap share 20% of their portfolios | itself | Aditya Birla Sun Life Flexi Cap and SBI FLEXICAP share 29% of their portfolios |
| SBI FLEXICAPFlexi Cap | SBI FLEXICAP and Nippon India Growth Mid Cap share 18% of their portfolios | SBI FLEXICAP and Aditya Birla Sun Life Flexi Cap share 29% of their portfolios | itself |
Closest pair: Aditya Birla Sun Life Flexi Cap Fund and SBI FLEXICAP FUND share 29% of their portfolios. Most of what each of them holds, the other does not; whether two funds this far apart belong in one portfolio is a separate question.
Read a cell as: of everything the two funds hold, this much is the same holding at the same weight. It is symmetric — the pair above the diagonal and the pair below it are one number shown twice. A pair at 0% holds nothing in common, which is a real answer, and often the useful one.
Side by side
record, cost, returns, drawdown, size
| Measure | Nippon India Growth Mid Cap | Aditya Birla Sun Life Flexi Cap | SBI FLEXICAP |
|---|---|---|---|
| Category | Mid Cap | Flexi Cap | Flexi Cap |
| Fund house | Nippon Life India Asset Management Limited | Aditya Birla Sun Life AMC Limited | SBI Funds Management Limited |
| Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P4 | 87% of 109 | 58% of 109 | 58% of 109 |
| Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P5 | 0.86% points | 1.02% points | 1.03% points |
| Portfolio turned over a year P1 | 52% | 50% | 129% |
| Run by P7 | Rupesh Patel · 3.6 yrs | Dhaval Joshi · ≥ 6 mo | Anup Upadhyay · ≥ 3 mo |
| 1-year return | 7.0% | 7.3% | −2.1% |
| 3 years p.a. | 18.6% | 15.0% | 8.6% |
| 5 years p.a. | 18.0% | 11.6% | 8.2% |
| Deepest fall (max drawdown) | −19.9% | −17.0% | −16.0% |
| Assets (AUM) | ₹48,143 Cr | ₹27,401 Cr | ₹22,888 Cr |
| Disclosed history | 14 yrs | 13 yrs | 5.8 yrs |
| Holdings · top ten weight | 105 · 25% | 89 · 28% | 71 · 36% |
Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — a category error is the first thing the postulates refuse to make. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.